provinces,with separate interests.laws,governments.and systems of taxation, one code of la ws,one national one customs tariff. The bourgeoisie,during its rule of scarce one hundred years,has created more massive and more than have all preeding ons together. Subjection of nture forces to m machinery application of chemistry to industry and agriculture,steam navigation, railwavs,electric telegraphs,clearing of whole continents for cultivation,canalization or rivers,whole populations conjured out of the ground-what earlier century had even a presentiment that such productive forces slumbered in the lap of social labor? We see then:the means of production and of exchange,on whose foundation the bourgeoisie built itself up,were generated in feudal society.At a certain stage in the development of these means of production and of exchange,the conditions under which feudal society produced and exchanged,the feudal rganization of agriculture and manufacturing industry,in one word,the feudal relations of property became no longer compatible with the already developed productive forces;they became so many fetters.They had to be burst asunder:they were burst asunder. Into their place stepped fre ompetition accompanied by a social and political constitution adapted in it,and the economic and political sway of the bourgeois class. A similar movement is going on before our own eves.Modern bourgeois society,with its relations of production,of exchange and of proper a society that has conjured up such gigantic means of production and of exchange,is like the sorcerer who is no longer able to control the powers of the nether world whom he has called up by his spells.For many a decade past,the history of industry and commerce is but the history of the revolt of modern productive forces against modern conditions of production against the property rel tha are the conditions for the exister of the bourgeois and of its rule.It is enough to mention the commercial crises that,by their periodical return,put the existence of the entire bourgeois society on its trial.each time more threateningly.In these crises,a great part not only of the existing products,but also of the eviously productive forces odically des royed.In these crises,there breaks out an epidemic that,in all earlier epochs would have seemed an absurdity-the epidemic of over-production.Society suddenly finds itself put back into a state of momentary barbarism;it appears as if a famine,a universal war of devastation,had cut off the
provinces, with separate interests, laws, governments, and systems of taxation, became lumped together into one nation, with one government, one code of laws, one national class interest, one frontier, and one customs tariff. The bourgeoisie, during its rule of scarce one hundred years, has created more massive and more colossal productive forces than have all preceding generations together. Subjection of nature's forces to man, machinery, application of chemistry to industry and agriculture, steam navigation, railways, electric telegraphs, clearing of whole continents for cultivation, canalization or rivers, whole populations conjured out of the ground - what earlier century had even a presentiment that such productive forces slumbered in the lap of social labor? We see then: the means of production and of exchange, on whose foundation the bourgeoisie built itself up, were generated in feudal society. At a certain stage in the development of these means of production and of exchange, the conditions under which feudal society produced and exchanged, the feudal organization of agriculture and manufacturing industry, in one word, the feudal relations of property became no longer compatible with the already developed productive forces; they became so many fetters. They had to be burst asunder; they were burst asunder. Into their place stepped free competition, accompanied by a social and political constitution adapted in it, and the economic and political sway of the bourgeois class. A similar movement is going on before our own eyes. Modern bourgeois society, with its relations of production, of exchange and of property, a society that has conjured up such gigantic means of production and of exchange, is like the sorcerer who is no longer able to control the powers of the nether world whom he has called up by his spells. For many a decade past, the history of industry and commerce is but the history of the revolt of modern productive forces against modern conditions of production, against the property relations that are the conditions for the existence of the bourgeois and of its rule. It is enough to mention the commercial crises that, by their periodical return, put the existence of the entire bourgeois society on its trial, each time more threateningly. In these crises, a great part not only of the existing products, but also of the previously created productive forces, are periodically destroyed. In these crises, there breaks out an epidemic that, in all earlier epochs, would have seemed an absurdity - the epidemic of over-production. Society suddenly finds itself put back into a state of momentary barbarism; it appears as if a famine, a universal war of devastation, had cut off the
supply of every means of subsistence:industry and commerce seem to be sroyed.And y?Because there is too muchcivliaionoo of subsis too much industry too much productiv forces at the disposal of society no longer tend to further the development of the conditions of bourgeois property:on the contrary,they have become too powerful for these conditions,by which they are fettered,and so soon as they overcome these fetters,they bring disorder into the whole of iety, of ho pr ty. The conditions c of bourgeois society are too narrow to comprise the wealth created by them.And how does the bourgeoisie get over these crises?On the one hand,by enforced destruction of a mass of productive forces:on the other.by the conquest of new markets.and by the more thorough exploitation of the old ones.That is to say,by paving the way for more extensive and more destructive crises,and by diminishing the means whereby crises are prevented. The weapons with which the bourgeoisie felled feudalism to the ground are now turned against the bourgeoisie itself. But not only has the bourgeoisie forged the weapons that bring death to itself;it has also called into existence the men who are to wield those weapons -the modern working class -the proletarians. In proportion as the bourgeoisie,i.e.,capital,is developed,in the same proportion is the proletariat,the modern working class,developed class of laborers,who live only so long as they find work,and who find work only so long as their labor increases capital.These laborers,who must sell themselves piecemeal,are a commodity,like every other article of commerce,and are consequently exposed to all the vicissitudes of competition to all the fluctuations of the market Owing to the extensive use of machinery,and to the division of labor, the work of the proletarians has lost all individual character,and, consequently,all charm for the workman.He becomes an appendage of the and it is o nly the most simple most monoton d m acquired knack,that is required of him.Hence,the cost of production of a workman is restricted,almost entirely,to the means of subsistence that he requires for maintenance,and for the propagation of his race. But the price of a commodity,and therefore also of labor,is equal to its cost of production. .In propo rtion,therefore, as the repulsiveness of the work increases,the wage decreases. What is more,in proportior as the use of machinery and division of labor increases,in the same proportion the burden of toil also increases,whether by prolongation of
supply of every means of subsistence; industry and commerce seem to be destroyed. And why? Because there is too much civilization, too much means of subsistence, too much industry, too much commerce. The productive forces at the disposal of society no longer tend to further the development of the conditions of bourgeois property; on the contrary, they have become too powerful for these conditions, by which they are fettered, and so soon as they overcome these fetters, they bring disorder into the whole of bourgeois society, endanger the existence of bourgeois property. The conditions of bourgeois society are too narrow to comprise the wealth created by them. And how does the bourgeoisie get over these crises? On the one hand, by enforced destruction of a mass of productive forces; on the other, by the conquest of new markets, and by the more thorough exploitation of the old ones. That is to say, by paving the way for more extensive and more destructive crises, and by diminishing the means whereby crises are prevented. The weapons with which the bourgeoisie felled feudalism to the ground are now turned against the bourgeoisie itself. But not only has the bourgeoisie forged the weapons that bring death to itself; it has also called into existence the men who are to wield those weapons - the modern working class - the proletarians. In proportion as the bourgeoisie, i.e., capital, is developed, in the same proportion is the proletariat, the modern working class, developed - a class of laborers, who live only so long as they find work, and who find work only so long as their labor increases capital. These laborers, who must sell themselves piecemeal, are a commodity, like every other article of commerce, and are consequently exposed to all the vicissitudes of competition, to all the fluctuations of the market. Owing to the extensive use of machinery, and to the division of labor, the work of the proletarians has lost all individual character, and, consequently, all charm for the workman. He becomes an appendage of the machine, and it is only the most simple, most monotonous, and most easily acquired knack, that is required of him. Hence, the cost of production of a workman is restricted, almost entirely, to the means of subsistence that he requires for maintenance, and for the propagation of his race. But the price of a commodity, and therefore also of labor, is equal to its cost of production. In proportion, therefore, as the repulsiveness of the work increases, the wage decreases. What is more, in proportion as the use of machinery and division of labor increases, in the same proportion the burden of toil also increases, whether by prolongation of
the working hours.by the increase of the work exacted in a given time or by increased speed of machinery,etc Modern Industry has converted the little workshop of the patriarchal master into the great factory of the industrial capitalist.Masses of laborers,crowded into the factory,are organized like soldiers.As privates of the industrial army,they are pla ced under the c perfect hierarchy of officers and sergeants.Not only are they slaves of the bourgeois class,and of the bourgeois state;they are daily and hourly enslaved by the machine,by the overlooker,and,above all,in the individual bourgeois manufacturer himself.The more openly this despotism proclaims gain to be its end and aim,the more petty,the more hateful and the more embittering it is. The less the skill and exertion of strength implied in manual labor,in other words,the more modern industry becomes developed,the more is the labor of men superseded by that of women.differences of age and sex have no longer any distinctive social validity for the working class.All are instruments of labor,more or less expensive to use,according to thei age and sex. No sooner is the exploitation of the laborer by the manufacturer,so far at an end.that he receives his wages in cash.than he is set upon by the other portion of the bourgeoisie,the landlord,the shopkeeper,the pawnbroker,etc The lower strata of the middle class -the small trades people, shopkeepers,and retired tradesmen generally,the handicraftsmen and all these sink gradually into the proletariat,partly becau their diminutive capital does not suffice for the scale on which Modern Industry is carried on,and is swamped in the competition with the large capitalists,partly because their specialized skill is rendered worthless by new methods of production.Thus,the proletariat is recruited from all classes of the population The proletariat goes through various stages of development.With its birth begins its struggle with the bourgeoisie.At first,the contest is carried on by individual laborers,then by the work of people of a factory,then by the operative of one trade.in one locality.against the individual who directly exploits them hey t their attacks not against the bourgeois condition of production,but against the instruments of production themselves;they destroy imported wares that compete with their labor,they smash to pieces machinery,they set
the working hours, by the increase of the work exacted in a given time, or by increased speed of machinery, etc. Modern Industry has converted the little workshop of the patriarchal master into the great factory of the industrial capitalist. Masses of laborers, crowded into the factory, are organized like soldiers. As privates of the industrial army, they are placed under the command of a perfect hierarchy of officers and sergeants. Not only are they slaves of the bourgeois class, and of the bourgeois state; they are daily and hourly enslaved by the machine, by the overlooker, and, above all, in the individual bourgeois manufacturer himself. The more openly this despotism proclaims gain to be its end and aim, the more petty, the more hateful and the more embittering it is. The less the skill and exertion of strength implied in manual labor, in other words, the more modern industry becomes developed, the more is the labor of men superseded by that of women. Differences of age and sex have no longer any distinctive social validity for the working class. All are instruments of labor, more or less expensive to use, according to their age and sex. No sooner is the exploitation of the laborer by the manufacturer, so far at an end, that he receives his wages in cash, than he is set upon by the other portion of the bourgeoisie, the landlord, the shopkeeper, the pawnbroker, etc. The lower strata of the middle class - the small trades people, shopkeepers, and retired tradesmen generally, the handicraftsmen and peasants - all these sink gradually into the proletariat, partly because their diminutive capital does not suffice for the scale on which Modern Industry is carried on, and is swamped in the competition with the large capitalists, partly because their specialized skill is rendered worthless by new methods of production. Thus, the proletariat is recruited from all classes of the population. The proletariat goes through various stages of development. With its birth begins its struggle with the bourgeoisie. At first, the contest is carried on by individual laborers, then by the work of people of a factory, then by the operative of one trade, in one locality, against the individual bourgeois who directly exploits them. They direct their attacks not against the bourgeois condition of production, but against the instruments of production themselves; they destroy imported wares that compete with their labor, they smash to pieces machinery, they set
factories ablaze,they seek to restore by force the vanished status of the workman of the Middle Ages. At this stage,the laborers still form an incoherent mass scattered over the whole country,and broken up by their mutual competition.If anywhere they unite to form more compact bodies,this is not yet the consequence of the active nion,but of the union of the bourgeoisie, in or attain its political the whole proletariat in motion,and is moreover yet,for a time,able to do so At this stage,therefore,the proletarians do not fight their enemies, but the enemies of their enemies,the remnants of absolute monarchy,the landowners.the non-industrial bourgeois.the petty bourgeois.Thus,the whole historical movement is concentrated in the hands of the bourgeoisie; every victory so obtained is a victory for the bourgeoisie But with the development of industry,the proletariat not only increases in number:it becomes concentrated in greater masses,its strength grows and it feels that strength more.The various interests and conditions of life within the ranks of the proletariat are more and mo e equalized,in proportion as machinery obliterates all distinctions of labor,and nearly everywhere reduces wages to the same low level.The growing competition among the bourgeois,and the resulting commercial crises,make the wages of the workers ever more fluctuating.The increasing improvement of machinery,ever more rapidly developing,makes their livelihood more and more precarious:the collisions between individual workmen and individua bourgeois take more and more the character of collisions between two classes.Thereupon,the workers begin to form combinations(trade unions) against the bourgeois:they club together in order to keep up the rate of wages:they found permanent associations in order to make provision beforehand for these occasional revolts. Here and there,the contest breaks out into riots. Now and then the workers are victorious,but only for a time.The real fruit of their battles lie not in the immediate result.but in the ever expanding union of the workers.This union is helped on by the improved means of communication that are created by Modern Industry,and that place the workers of different localities in contact with one another.It was iust this contact that was needed to centralize the numerous local struggles,all of the same character,into one national struggle between classes.But every class struggle is a political struggle.And that union to attain which the burghers of the Middle Ages,with their miserable highways,required centuries,the modern proletarian,thanks to railways, achieve in a few years
factories ablaze, they seek to restore by force the vanished status of the workman of the Middle Ages. At this stage, the laborers still form an incoherent mass scattered over the whole country, and broken up by their mutual competition. If anywhere they unite to form more compact bodies, this is not yet the consequence of their own active union, but of the union of the bourgeoisie, which class, in order to attain its own political ends, is compelled to set the whole proletariat in motion, and is moreover yet, for a time, able to do so. At this stage, therefore, the proletarians do not fight their enemies, but the enemies of their enemies, the remnants of absolute monarchy, the landowners, the non-industrial bourgeois, the petty bourgeois. Thus, the whole historical movement is concentrated in the hands of the bourgeoisie; every victory so obtained is a victory for the bourgeoisie. But with the development of industry, the proletariat not only increases in number; it becomes concentrated in greater masses, its strength grows, and it feels that strength more. The various interests and conditions of life within the ranks of the proletariat are more and more equalized, in proportion as machinery obliterates all distinctions of labor, and nearly everywhere reduces wages to the same low level. The growing competition among the bourgeois, and the resulting commercial crises, make the wages of the workers ever more fluctuating. The increasing improvement of machinery, ever more rapidly developing, makes their livelihood more and more precarious; the collisions between individual workmen and individual bourgeois take more and more the character of collisions between two classes. Thereupon, the workers begin to form combinations (trade unions) against the bourgeois; they club together in order to keep up the rate of wages; they found permanent associations in order to make provision beforehand for these occasional revolts. Here and there, the contest breaks out into riots. Now and then the workers are victorious, but only for a time. The real fruit of their battles lie not in the immediate result, but in the ever expanding union of the workers. This union is helped on by the improved means of communication that are created by Modern Industry, and that place the workers of different localities in contact with one another. It was just this contact that was needed to centralize the numerous local struggles, all of the same character, into one national struggle between classes. But every class struggle is a political struggle. And that union, to attain which the burghers of the Middle Ages, with their miserable highways, required centuries, the modern proletarian, thanks to railways, achieve in a few years
This organization of the proletarians into a class,and.consequently is continually being stronger,firmer,mightier.It compels legislative recognition of particular interests of the workers,by taking advantage of the divisions among the bourgeoisie itself.Thus.the Ten-Hours Bill in England was carried. Altogether,collisions between the classes of the old society further in many ways the course of development of the proletariat.The bourgeoisie finds itself involved in a constant battle.At first with the aristocracy: later on,with those portions of the bourgeoisie itself,whose interests have become antagonistic to the progre of industry;at all time with the bourgeoisie of foreign countries.In all these battles,it sees itself compelled to appeal to the proletariat,to ask for help,and thus to drag it into the political arena.The bourgeoisie itself,therefore,supplies the proletariat with its own elements of political and general education, in other words,it furnishes the proletariat with weapons for fighting the bourgeoisie. Further,as we have already seen,entire sections of the ruling class are, by the advance of industry,precipitated into the proletariat,or are at least threatened in their conditions of existence.These also supply the proletariat with fresh elements of enlightenment and progress Finally,in times when the class struggle nears the decisive hour,the progress of dissolution going on within the ruling class,in fact within the whole range of old society,assumes such a violent,glaring character, that a small section of the ruling class cuts itself adrift and ioins the revolutionary class,the class that holds the future in its hands Just as,therefore,at an earlier period,a section of the nobility went over to the bourgeoisie,so now a portion of the bourgeoisie goes over to the proletariat,and in particular,a portion of the bourgeois ideologists,who have raised themselves to the level of comprehending theoretically the historical movement as a whole of all the classes that stand face to face with the bourgeoisie today, the proletariat alone is a genuinely revolutionary class.The other classes decay and finally disappear in the face of Modern Industry:the proletariat is its special and essential product. The lower middle class,the small manufacturer,the shopkeeper,the artisan,the peasant,all these fight against the bourgeoisie,to save from extinction their existence as fractions of the middle class.They
This organization of the proletarians into a class, and, consequently, into a political party, is continually being upset again by the competition between the workers themselves. But it ever rises up again, stronger, firmer, mightier. It compels legislative recognition of particular interests of the workers, by taking advantage of the divisions among the bourgeoisie itself. Thus, the Ten-Hours Bill in England was carried. Altogether, collisions between the classes of the old society further in many ways the course of development of the proletariat. The bourgeoisie finds itself involved in a constant battle. At first with the aristocracy; later on, with those portions of the bourgeoisie itself, whose interests have become antagonistic to the progress of industry; at all time with the bourgeoisie of foreign countries. In all these battles, it sees itself compelled to appeal to the proletariat, to ask for help, and thus to drag it into the political arena. The bourgeoisie itself, therefore, supplies the proletariat with its own elements of political and general education, in other words, it furnishes the proletariat with weapons for fighting the bourgeoisie. Further, as we have already seen, entire sections of the ruling class are, by the advance of industry, precipitated into the proletariat, or are at least threatened in their conditions of existence. These also supply the proletariat with fresh elements of enlightenment and progress. Finally, in times when the class struggle nears the decisive hour, the progress of dissolution going on within the ruling class, in fact within the whole range of old society, assumes such a violent, glaring character, that a small section of the ruling class cuts itself adrift, and joins the revolutionary class, the class that holds the future in its hands. Just as, therefore, at an earlier period, a section of the nobility went over to the bourgeoisie, so now a portion of the bourgeoisie goes over to the proletariat, and in particular, a portion of the bourgeois ideologists, who have raised themselves to the level of comprehending theoretically the historical movement as a whole. Of all the classes that stand face to face with the bourgeoisie today, the proletariat alone is a genuinely revolutionary class. The other classes decay and finally disappear in the face of Modern Industry; the proletariat is its special and essential product. The lower middle class, the small manufacturer, the shopkeeper, the artisan, the peasant, all these fight against the bourgeoisie, to save from extinction their existence as fractions of the middle class. They