中国政法大学：2012版国际法学院课程教学大纲汇编

国际法学院专业课程教学大纲FurtherReading:1.Steiner,J.and L.Woods,TextbookonEClaw,8thedition,OxfordUniversityPress,20032.Weatherill,S.Casesand MaterialsonEULaw,6th edition,OxfordUniversityPress,20033.Tillotson,J.&Foster,N.,EuropeanUnionLaw:Text,CasesandMaterials,4thedition,Cavendishpress,20034.H.Temmink“From Danish bottles to Danish bees: the dynamics of free movement ofgoods and environmental protection-a case law analysis"(2000) Yearbook ofEuropeanEnvironmental Lawvol.1 p.61-10210

国际法学院专业课程教学大纲 10 Further Reading: 1．Steiner, J. and L. Woods, Textbook on EC law, 8th edition, Oxford University Press, 2003. 2. Weatherill, S. Cases and Materials on EU Law, 6th edition, Oxford University Press, 2003. 3．Tillotson, J. & Foster, N., European Union Law: Text, Cases and Materials, 4th edition, Cavendish press, 2003. 4．H. Temmink “From Danish bottles to Danish bees: the dynamics of free movement of goods and environmental protection-a case law analysis” (2000) Yearbook of European Environmental Law vol. 1 p.61-102

欧洲联盟法经典案例课程（双语）Chapter FourPrinciple of Primacy:Constitutional AdministrativeAspects ofEULaw本章教学目的和基本要求：本章在介绍欧洲联盟法的宪法与行政方面的基本法律框架，尤其是介绍确立欧盟法与成员国法关系的优先效力原则”（principleofsupremacy）。这也是欧洲法院通过实践创设的新规则，通过后续的欧洲一体化实践，被引入了欧盟的基础条约。本章通过Costav.ENEL案，分析优先原则的产生，还通过CassisdeDijon（Case120/78）Factortamecase（1989)等案件，分析各成员国对欧盟法优先原则的接受与认同。学时分配：8学时。Section1Principle of PrimacyCase No.1 Case of Costa(1964)I.Basic information1. the parties of the case:Applicant:Flaminio Costa,an Italian citizenDefendant: Ente Nationale perI"Energia Electrica,ENEL, the Italian electricity company2.source:Case6/64,Costav.ENEL,[1964]ECR5853. articles related:ARTICLES102,93,53and37oftheECTreaty4.keywords:Community legal system,supremacyII. Holding(l)Theintegrationintothe lawsoftheeachMemberStateprovisionswhichderivefromtheCommunity,and moregenerally theterms and thespiritoftheTreaty,makes itimpossibleforthe States,asa corollary,to accordprecedencetoaunilateralandsubsequentmeasure overalegal systemaccepted bythem onabasis of reciprocity(2)ltfollowsfrom all theseobservations thatthe law stemmingfromtheTreaty,an.independentsourceof law,could not,because ofits specialand original nature,beoverriddenbydomesticlegalprovisions,howeverframed,withoutbeingdeprivedofitscharacteras Community law and without the legal basis of the Community itself beingcalled intoquestion.The transferby the States from their domestic legal systemto theCommunity legal system of the rights and obligations arising under the Treaty carrieswithitapermanentlimitationoftheirsovereignrights,againstwhichasubsequent11

欧洲联盟法经典案例课程（双语） 11 Chapter Four Principle of Primacy： Constitutional Administrative Aspects of EU Law 本章教学目的和基本要求： 本章旨在介绍欧洲联盟法的宪法与行政方面的基本法律框架，尤其是介绍确立欧盟法与成员国 法关系的“优先效力原则”（principle of supremacy）。这也是欧洲法院通过实践创设的新规则，通过 后续的欧洲一体化实践，被引入了欧盟的基础条约。 本章通过 Costa v. ENEL 案，分析优先原则的产生，还通过 Cassis de Dijon（Case 120/78）,Factortame case (1989)等案件，分析各成员国对欧盟法优先原则的接受与认同。 学时分配：8 学时。 Section 1 Principle of Primacy Case No.1 Case of Costa(1964) I. Basic information 1. the parties of the case: Applicant: Flaminio Costa , an Italian citizen Defendant: Ente Nationale per l"Energia Electrica , ENEL, the Italian electricity company 2. source: Case 6/64,Costa v. ENEL, [1964] ECR 585 3. articles related: ARTICLES 102, 93, 53 and 37 of the EC Treaty 4. keywords: Community legal system, supremacy II. Holding . (1)The integration into the laws of the each Member State provisions which derive from the Community, and more generally the terms and the spirit of the Treaty, makes it impossible for the States, as a corollary, to accord precedence to a unilateral and subsequent measure over a legal system accepted by them on a basis of reciprocity. . (2)It follows from all these observations that the law stemming from the Treaty, an independent source of law, could not, because of its special and original nature, be overridden by domestic legal provisions, however framed, without being deprived of its character as Community law and without the legal basis of the Community itself being called into question. The transfer by the States from their domestic legal system to the Community legal system of the rights and obligations arising under the Treaty carries with it a permanent limitation of their sovereign rights, against which a subsequent

国际法学院专业课程教学大纲unilateral actincompatiblewiththeconceptoftheCommunity cannotprevail.II. Related Legal Issues1. preliminary ruling2.fundamentalprinciplesoftheCommunitylegal system(I) Direct effect, as defined in the van Gend en Loos judgment.(2) Supremacy, as defined in the Costa/ENEl judgment of 1964.(3) State liability for damage caused to individuals as a consequence of a breach of community law.IV. The Principle of SupremacyTest for treaty provision having direct effect and primacy1 clear&precisesoobligation of MSorindividual couldbedeterminedwith certainty2 unconditional - in full force (if in transition period or conditional to enforcement - could not haveDE);3 must be no additional requirements for implementation (further action),4Standstill provns静止条款/维持现状条款wereeasilyseentohaveDESection22 Later development of principle of PrimacyI. Case No.2SimmenthalcaseFacts:Holding:Reasoning:Analysis:II. Cassis de Dijon, Case 120/78Facts:Holding:Reasoning:Analysis:III. Later development of principle of Primacy意大利宪法法院德国宪法法院荷兰法院宪法Endof ChapterAssessmentQuestion1.Which arguments were used by the court to support the existence of the principle of supremacy?Evaluatethesearguments12

国际法学院专业课程教学大纲 12 unilateral act incompatible with the concept of the Community cannot prevail. III. Related Legal Issues 1. preliminary ruling 2. fundamental principles of the Community legal system (1) Direct effect, as defined in the van Gend en Loos judgment. (2) Supremacy, as defined in the Costa/ENEl judgment of 1964. (3) State liability for damage caused to individuals as a consequence of a breach of community law. IV. The Principle of Supremacy Test for treaty provision having direct effect and primacy: 1 clear & precise so obligation of MS or individual could be determined with certainty; 2 unconditional – in full force (if in transition period or conditional to enforcement – could not have DE); 3 must be no additional requirements for implementation (further action); 4 Standstill provns 静止条款/维持现状条款 were easily seen to have DE Section 2 Later development of principle of Primacy I. Case No.2 Simmenthal case Facts: Holding: Reasoning: Analysis: II. Cassis de Dijon, Case 120/78 Facts: Holding: Reasoning: Analysis: III. Later development of principle of Primacy 意大利宪法法院 德国宪法法院 荷兰法院宪法 End of Chapter Assessment Question 1. Which arguments were used by the court to support the existence of the principle of supremacy? Evaluate these arguments

欧洲联盟法经典案例课程（双语）2. What is the significance of the principle of supremacy? Why is supremacy such an importantprinciple of Community law?3. Define the principle of supremacy4.Explain the relationship between the principle of direct effect and the principle of supremacy5.Istheprincipleofsupremacyunconditional?Further Reading:1.Paul Graig&GrainnedeBurca eds.,TheEvolutionof EULaw,2ndEdition,OxfordUniversityPress, 2011;2.T.C.Hartley,The Foundations of European Community Law, 5th ed.Oxford, 20033.H. Wallace & W. Wallace (eds), Policy-Making in the European Union, 4th ed, London, 2000:4.JoShaw,Lawof theEuropeanUnion,3rd ed.,Palgrave,2000,5.S.Weatherill,Cases and Materialson ECLaw,5th ed.,Blackstone,London,20006.【德]马迪亚斯·赫蒂根著《欧洲法》（张恩民译），法律出版社，2003年版：7.曾令良著《欧洲联盟法总论》，武汉大学出版社2007年版；13

欧洲联盟法经典案例课程（双语） 13 2. What is the significance of the principle of supremacy? Why is supremacy such an important principle of Community law? 3. Define the principle of supremacy. 4. Explain the relationship between the principle of direct effect and the principle of supremacy. 5. Is the principle of supremacy unconditional? Further Reading: 1. Paul Graig & Grainne de Burca eds., The Evolution of EU Law, 2nd Edition, Oxford University Press, 2011; 2.T.C. Hartley, The Foundations of European Community Law, 5th ed. Oxford, 2003. 3.H. Wallace & W. Wallace (eds), Policy-Making in the European Union, 4th ed, London, 2000; 4.Jo Shaw, Law of the European Union, 3rd ed., Palgrave, 2000; 5. S. Weatherill, Cases and Materials on EC Law, 5th ed., Blackstone, London, 2000. 6. [德]马迪亚斯·赫蒂根著《欧洲法》（张恩民译），法律出版社，2003年版； 7. 曾令良著《欧洲联盟法总论》, 武汉大学出版社2007年版；

国际法学院专业课程教学大纲ChapterFivePrincipleofsubsidiarity本章教学目的和基本要求：本章的教学目的是使学生了解和掌握欧共体/欧盟与成员国之间的权力划分规则一一辅助性原则（Principle of subsidiarity)。本章通过United Kingdom v.Council of the European Union案和Germanyv.Parliament&Council案，以及《辅助性原则的议定书》等文件，分析欧盟与成员国之间的权限划分，并探讨欧盟的劳工保护规则。学时分配：4学时。I.CaseNo.IUnitedKingdomv.CounciloftheEuropeanUnion.background?facts.issues。 relevant rules. holding.reasoning.significance/reviewII. Case No.2Germanyv.Parliament &Council。Background.Facts·Pleas·Rules?Application. Holding.ReviewIII. Principle of subsidiarity《欧共体条约》第3b条《欧盟条约》第B条（后修订为第2条）《里斯本条约》IV. Related Legal Issues1.Lack of competence/defectivelegal base2. Misuse of powerEndofChapterAssessmentQuestion1.What is the weight of the principle of subsidiarity?2.what is the new development of principle of subsidiaritybythe Lisbon Treaty?14

国际法学院专业课程教学大纲 14 Chapter Five Principle of subsidiarity 本章教学目的和基本要求： 本章的教学目的是使学生了解和掌握欧共体/欧盟与成员国之间的权力划分规则——辅助性原 则（Principle of subsidiarity）。本章通过United Kingdom v. Council of the European Union案和Germany v. Parliament & Council案，以及《辅助性原则的议定书》等文件，分析欧盟与成员国之间的权限划 分，并探讨欧盟的劳工保护规则。 学时分配：4 学时。 I．Case No. 1 United Kingdom v. Council of the European Union  background  facts  issues  relevant rules  holding  reasoning  significance/ review II．Case No. 2 Germany v. Parliament & Council  Background  Facts  Pleas  Rules  Application  Holding  Review III．Principle of subsidiarity 《欧共体条约》第 3b 条 《欧盟条约》第 B 条（后修订为第 2 条） 《里斯本条约》 IV. Related Legal Issues 1. Lack of competence/defective legal base 2. Misuse of power End of Chapter Assessment Question 1. What is the weight of the principle of subsidiarity? 2. what is the new development of principle of subsidiarity by the Lisbon Treaty?