Notes of CautionFindings only reflect general public perception of the nineinstitutions and their leaders, they are not results ofobjective appraisals or professional assessments.Absolute ratings (i.e. O-l0)are used in the key questions,they aremethodologicallymorepowerfulthanrelativerankings, because the score received by each institutioninany one year is independent of the scores of otherinstitutions, or its own score in another years.Seguence of prompting respondents with the name of nineinstitutions was randomlyrotated to avoid possible biasAll respondents have been told at the beginning of theinterview thatPOPwas an independent research body
Notes of Caution • Findings only reflect general public perception of the nine institutions and their leaders, they are not results of objective appraisals or professional assessments. • Absolute ratings (i.e. 0-10) are used in the key questions, they are methodologically more powerful than relative rankings, because the score received by each institution in any one year is independent of the scores of other institutions, or its own score in another years. • Sequence of prompting respondents with the name of nine institutions was randomly rotated to avoid possible bias. • All respondents have been told at the beginning of the interview that POP was an independent research body
DemographicProfileofRespondents
Demographic Profile of Respondents
GenderFemaleMale54%46%Valid samples : 1,213
Gender Female 54% Male 46% Valid samples：1,213
Age Distribution18-20 yrs old60+ yrs old21-29 yrs old5%20%15%50-59 yrs old30-39 yrs old18%19%40-49 yrs old23%Valid samples : 1,177
Age Distribution 18-20 yrs old 5 % 21-29 yrs old 15% 30-39 yrs old 19% 40-49 yrs old 23% 50-59 yrs old 18% 60+ yrs old 20% Valid samples：1,177