George Lakoff and Mark Johnsen(2003)Metaphors we live by.London:The university of Chicago press. Noter om layout: Sidetall overst Et par figurer slettet Referanser til slutt Innholdsfortegnelse i Word: George Lakoff and Mark Johnsen (2003)Metaphors we live by.London:The university of Chicago press. 1 Noter0 m layout:.… Innholdsfortegnelse i Word:................. …1 C0 ntents.… 4 Acknowledgments......... 6 1.Concepts We Live By................ 8 2.The Systematicity of Metaphorical Concepts 11 3.Metaphorical Systematicity:Highlighting and Hiding 13 4.Orientational Metaphors.................. 16 5.Metaphor and Cultural Coherence............... 21 6 Ontological Metaphors 23 7.Personification. 28 8.Metonymy… 29 9.Challenges to Metaphorical Coherence............. 34 10.Some Further Examples....... .37 11.The Partial Nature of Metaphorical Structuring. 41 12.How Is Our Conceptual System Grounded?......................44 13.The Grounding of Structural Metaphors....... 48 14.Causation:Partly Emergent and Partly Metaphorical 54 15 The Coherent Structuring of Experience.... 59 16.Metaphorical Coherence......... 66 17.Complex Coherences across Metaphors.............. 73 18.Some Consequences for Theories of Conceptual Structure 79 19 Definition and Understanding.......... 85 20.How Metaphor Can Give Meaning to Form.... 92 21.New Meaning.… ..102 22.The Creation of Similarity................... .107 23.Metaphor,Truth,and Action. .114 24.Truth..... 116 25.The Myths of Objectivism and Subjectivism.................... .133
George Lakoff and Mark Johnsen (2003) Metaphors we live by. London: The university of Chicago press. Noter om layout: - Sidetall øverst - Et par figurer slettet - Referanser til slutt Innholdsfortegnelse i Word: George Lakoff and Mark Johnsen (2003) Metaphors we live by. London: The university of Chicago press. ......................................................................................................................1 Noter om layout:...................................................................................................................1 Innholdsfortegnelse i Word:.................................................................................................1 Contents................................................................................................................................4 Acknowledgments................................................................................................................6 1. Concepts We Live By .....................................................................................................8 2. The Systematicity of Metaphorical Concepts...............................................................11 3. Metaphorical Systematicity: Highlighting and Hiding.................................................13 4. Orientational Metaphors.................................................................................................16 5. Metaphor and Cultural Coherence .................................................................................21 6 Ontological Metaphors...................................................................................................23 7. Personification................................................................................................................28 8. Metonymy.......................................................................................................................29 9. Challenges to Metaphorical Coherence ........................................................................34 10. Some Further Examples...............................................................................................37 11. The Partial Nature of Metaphorical Structuring.........................................................41 12. How Is Our Conceptual System Grounded?...............................................................44 13. The Grounding of Structural Metaphors......................................................................48 14. Causation: Partly Emergent and Partly Metaphorical..................................................54 15 The Coherent Structuring of Experience .....................................................................59 16. Metaphorical Coherence.............................................................................................66 17.Complex Coherences across Metaphors......................................................................73 18. Some Consequences for Theories of Conceptual Structure .........................................79 19 Definition and Understanding......................................................................................85 20. How Metaphor Can Give Meaning to Form...............................................................92 21. New Meaning............................................................................................................102 22. The Creation of Similarity ........................................................................................107 23. Metaphor, Truth, and Action....................................................................................114 24. Truth...........................................................................................................................116 25. The Myths of Objectivism and Subjectivism...........................................................133
26.The Myth of Objectivism in Western Philosophy and Linguistics.140 27.How Metaphor Reveals the Limitations of the Myth of Objectivism.......................149 28.Some Inadequacies of the Myth of Subjectivism.................... .158 29.The Experientialist Alternative:Giving New Meaning to the Old Myths 161 30.Understanding. .163 168 Arterword......................................................................................................... References.… 169 Afterword,2003 170 References.... 191
26. The Myth of Objectivism in Western Philosophy and Linguistics..........................140 27. How Metaphor Reveals the Limitations of the Myth of Objectivism........................149 28. Some Inadequacies of the Myth of Subjectivism.....................................................158 29. The Experientialist Alternative: Giving New Meaning to the Old Myths.................161 30. Understanding...........................................................................................................163 Afterword .........................................................................................................................168 References........................................................................................................................169 Afterword, 2003 ...............................................................................................................170 References........................................................................................................................191
The University of Chicago Press,Chicago,60637 The University of Chicago Press,Ltd.,London 1980 by The University of Chicago Afterword 2003 by The University of Chicago All rights reserved.Published 2003 Printed in the United States of America 1211009080706050403 12345 ISBN:0-226-6801-1(paperback) Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Lakotl,George. Metaphors we live hy George l.akoff and Mark Johnson.p.cm. Originally published:Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1980. Includes hihliographical references. ISBN 0-226-4680 1-1 (phk.:alk.paper) 1.Language and languages--Philosophy.2.Metaphor.3.Conceps.4.Truth.I.Johnson,Mark,1949-11.TiOe. PI06.1.2352003401-dc2I (2003044774) The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard tir Information Sciences-Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials.ANSI 7,39.48-1992. Much of the material in all or parts of chapters I through 5,9 through 12,14,18,and 21 originally appeared in the article"Conceptual Metaphor in Everyday Language,"Joural of Philosophy 77 no.8(August 19):453-6,and is reprinted here with the kind permission of the editors of the olfPhilosophy. For Andy and The Gherkin
The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 60637 The University of Chicago Press, Ltd., London 1980 by The University of Chicago Afterword © 2003 by The University of Chicago All rights reserved. Published 2003 Printed in the United States of America 12 II 1009080706050403 12 3 4 5 ISBN: 0-226-46801-1 (paperback) Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Lakotl, George. Metaphors we live hy / George I.akoff and Mark Johnson. p. cm. Originally published: Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1980. Includes hihliographical references. ISBN 0-226-4680 1-1 (phk.: alk. paper) 1. Language and languages---Philosophy. 2. Metaphor. 3. Concepts. 4. Truth. I. Johnson, Mark, 1949-11. Ti0e. PI06 .1.235 2003 401--dc2I ((2003044774)) The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard tir Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials. ANSI 7,39.48— 1992. Much of the material in all or parts of chapters I through 5, 9 through 12, 14, 18, and 21 originally appeared in the article "Conceptual Metaphor in Everyday Language," Journal of Philosophy 77, no. 8 (August 1980) : 453-86, and is reprinted here with the kind permission of the editors of the Journal of Philosophy. For Andy and The Gherkin
Contents Preface ix Acknowledgments xi 1.Concepts We Live By 2.The Systematicity of Metaphorical Concepts 3.Metaphorical Systematicity:Highlighting and Hiding 4.Orientational Metaphors 5.Metaphor and Cultural Coherence 6.Ontological Metaphors 7.Personification 8.Metonymy 9.Challenges to Metaphorical Coherence 10.Some Further Examples 11.The Partial Nature of Metaphorical Structuring 12.How Is Our Conceptual System Grounded? 13.The Grounding of Structural Metaphors 14.Causation:Partly Emergent and Partly Metaphorical 15.The Coherent Structuring of Experience 16.Metaphorical Coherence vii
Contents Preface Acknowledgments ix xi 1. Concepts We Live By 2. The Systematicity of Metaphorical Concepts 3. Metaphorical Systematicity: Highlighting and Hiding 4. Orientational Metaphors 5. Metaphor and Cultural Coherence 6. Ontological Metaphors 7. Personification 8. Metonymy 9. Challenges to Metaphorical Coherence 10. Some Further Examples 11. The Partial Nature of Metaphorical Structuring 12. How Is Our Conceptual System Grounded? 13. The Grounding of Structural Metaphors 14. Causation: Partly Emergent and Partly Metaphorical 15. The Coherent Structuring of Experience 16. Metaphorical Coherence vii
ISBN0-226-46801-1 Preface This book grew out of a concern,on both our parts,with how people understand their language and their experience.When we first met,in early January 1979,we found that we shared,also,a sense that the dominant views on meaning in Western philosophy and linguistics are inadequate-that"meaning"in these traditions has very little to do with what people find ineaningfrrl in their lives. We were brought together by a joint interest in metaphor.Mark had found that most traditional philosophical views permit metaphor little,if any,role in understanding our world and ourselves.George had discovered linguistic evidence showing that metaphor is pervasive in everyday language and thought-evidence that did not fit any contemporary Anglo-American theory of meaning within either linguistics or philosophy.Metaphor has traditionally been viewed in both fields as a matter of peripheral interest.We shared the intuition that it is,instead,a matter of central concern,perhaps the key to giving an adequate account of understanding. Shortly after we met,we decided to collaborate on what we thought would be a brief paper giving some linguistic evidence to point up shortcomings in recent theories of meaning.Within a week we discovered that certain assumptions of contemporary philosophy and linguistics that have been taken for granted within the Western tradition since the Greeks precluded us from even raising the kind of issues we wanted to address. The problem was not one of extending or patching up some existing theory of meaning ((ix)) (☒) but of revising central assumptions in the Western philosophical tradition.In particular. this meant rejecting the possibility of any objective or absolute truth and a host of related assumptions.It also meant supplying an alternative account in which human experience and understanding,rather than objective truth,played the central role.In the process,we have worked out elements of an experientialist approach,not only to issues of language, truth,and under-standing but to questions about the meaningfulness of our everyday experience. Berkeley,California July 1,1979((
ISBN 0-226-46801-1 Preface This book grew out of a concern, on both our parts, with how people understand their language and their experience. When we first met, in early January 1979, we found that we shared, also, a sense that the dominant views on meaning in Western philosophy and linguistics are inadequate—that "meaning" in these traditions has very little to do with what people find ineaningfrrl in their lives. We were brought together by a joint interest in metaphor. Mark had found that most traditional philosophical views permit metaphor little, if any, role in understanding our world and ourselves. George had discovered linguistic evidence showing that metaphor is pervasive in everyday language and thought—evidence that did not fit any contemporary Anglo-American theory of meaning within either linguistics or philosophy. Metaphor has traditionally been viewed in both fields as a matter of peripheral interest. We shared the intuition that it is, instead, a matter of central concern, perhaps the key to giving an adequate account of understanding. Shortly after we met, we decided to collaborate on what we thought would be a brief paper giving some linguistic evidence to point up shortcomings in recent theories of meaning. Within a week we discovered that certain assumptions of contemporary philosophy and linguistics that have been taken for granted within the Western tradition since the Greeks precluded us from even raising the kind of issues we wanted to address. The problem was not one of extending or patching up some existing theory of meaning ((ix)) ((x)) but of revising central assumptions in the Western philosophical tradition. In particular, this meant rejecting the possibility of any objective or absolute truth and a host of related assumptions. It also meant supplying an alternative account in which human experience and understanding, rather than objective truth, played the central role. In the process, we have worked out elements of an experientialist approach, not only to issues of language, truth, and under-standing but to questions about the meaningfulness of our everyday experience. Berkeley, California July 1, 1979((