nature publishing grour 孙子兵法 知己知彼百战百胜 g nature asia-pacihic h A Established 1987 as Nature Japan K.K
Rachel PC Won 孙子兵法: 知己知彼 百战百胜
nature publishing grour What editors seek High degree of novelty or innovation 高度新奇或创新的主题 Interesting to a broad range of readers 能引起广泛的读者感兴趣 Significant step forward 值得注意的的进步 Breakthrough in performance 突破的表现 High impact in the field 重大的影响 Important advance in scientific understanding that provides new directions for research 在科学理论上有显著,优越的进展为研究提供新的方向 Data persuasively supports conclusions 可说服性地支持结论的数据 g nature asia-pacifc h A Established 1987 as Nature Japan K.K
Rachel PC Won What editors seek • High degree of novelty or innovation 高度新奇或创新的主题 • Interesting to a broad range of readers 能引起广泛的读者感兴趣 • Significant step forward 值得注意的的进步 • Breakthrough in performance 突破的表现 • High impact in the field 重大的影响 • Important advance in scientific understanding that provides new directions for research 在科学理论上有显著, 优越的进展为研究提供新的方向 • Data persuasively supports conclusions 可说服性地支持结论的数据
nature publishing grour Editorial Processes Editorial Submission assessment Decline Revision External requested peer review Editorial decision Accept Decline 2 g nature asia-pacihic h A Established 1987 as Nature Japan K.K
Rachel PC Won Submission Editorial assessment Decline External peer review Editorial decision Decline Revision requested Accept Editorial Processes
nature publishing grour Results Several possibilities Accept, with or without editorial revisions Invite the authors to revise their manuscript to address specITIc concerns Reject, but indicate to the authors that further work might justify a resubmission Reject outright, typically on grounds of specialist interest lack of novelty, insufficient conceptual advance or technical/interpretational problems g nature asia-pacihic h A Established 1987 as Nature Japan K.K
Rachel PC Won Results Several possibilities: • Accept, with or without editorial revisions • Invite the authors to revise their manuscript to address specific concerns • Reject, but indicate to the authors that further work might justify a resubmission • Reject outright, typically on grounds of specialist interest, lack of novelty, insufficient conceptual advance or technical/interpretational problems