On Death and Dying By Elisabeth Kubler-Ross s Foreword by C. murray Parkes Acknowledgments Preface Section Titl On the fear of Death II Attitudes Toward Death and Dying... III First Stage: Denial and Isolation IV Second Stage: Anger V Third Stage: Bargaining VI Fourth Stage: Depression VII Fifth Stage: Acceptance Ⅴ III Hope The Patient's Family X Some Interviews with Terminally I'll Patients XI Reactions to the Seminar on Death and Dying XII Therapy with the Terminally Ill F rd by C. Murray Parkes I wish I could tell people how nice it can be to die of cancer. These surprising words were spoken to me recently by a woman who died peacefully a few days later. She never met Dr. Kubler-Ros but I do not doubt that, had she been a patient in Billings Hospital, she would have been glad of the opportunity to talk about dying at Dr. Ross's seminar and to have attempted to exorcise the irrational fears to which doctors and clergy as well as patients and their relatives are subject Not that it is entirely irrational to fear death. whatever we believe is to come after death, the loss of so many of the things that we prize must be painful, and since our own death gives grief to others it is natural that we feel sad on their behalf. But the relinquishment of life is possible (particularly if, through illness, our body has lost its appetite for living ), and grief can pass. Those who have the privilege of caring for the person who is about to die know that the final phase of life can be a time of peaceful acceptance, a time of calm which contrasts with the tensions and frustrations of the battle for survival
On Death and Dying By Elisabeth Kubler-Ross Contents: * Foreword by C. Murray Parkes * Acknowledgments * Preface Section Title Page I On the Fear of Death .................. II Attitudes Toward Death and Dying .................. III First Stage: Denial and Isolation .................. IV Second Stage: Anger .................. V Third Stage: Bargaining .................. VI Fourth Stage: Depression .................. VII Fifth Stage: Acceptance .................. VIII Hope .................. IX The Patient's Family .................. X Some Interviews with Terminally I'll Patients .................. XI Reactions to the Seminar on Death and Dying .................. XII Therapy with the Terminally Ill .................. ========================= Foreword by C. Murray Parkes °I wish I could tell people how nice it can be to die of cancer." These surprising words were spoken to me recently by a woman who died peacefully a few days later. She never met Dr. Kubler-Ross, but I do not doubt that, had she been a patient in Billings Hospital, she would have been glad of the opportunity to talk about dying at Dr. Ross's seminar and to have attempted to exorcise the irrational fears to which doctors and clergy as well as patients and their relatives are subject. Not that it is entirely irrational to fear death. Whatever we believe is to come after death, the loss of so many of the things that we prize must be painful, and since our own death gives grief to others it is natural that we feel sad on their behalf. But the relinquishment of life is possible (particularly if, through illness, our body has lost its appetite for living), and grief can pass. Those who have the privilege of caring for the person who is about to die know that the final phase of life can be a time of peaceful acceptance, a time of calm which contrasts with the tensions and frustrations of the battle for survival
Can be"-but, too often, is not. Too many things militate against a fitting approach to death. Despite all evidence to the contrary, we insist on assuming we are immortal and assuring each other that al of us are on a space walk, immune from the laws of celestial gravity. Dont worry, says the doctor, it's only a little ulcer","Come now, "says the nurse, "You mustn,'t talk like that, you're going to be A well-rounded life should have a beginning, a middle, and an end. Not just for reasons of symmetry but because, though I may be mortal, the social system of which I am a part is immortal and my arrival into and departure from that social system are important events which need to be prepared for. Medicine should not confine itself to the prevention of death any more than family planning should confine itself to the prevention of birth. But it is, perhaps, no coincidence that the century which produced Marie Stopes and Alexander Fleming also produced grantly Dick Reid and Elisabeth Kubler-Ross It seems that incipient mortality, though less easy to predict than incipient nativity, is equally a proper matter for preparation and study Dr Ross is not alone in her concern for those who are about to die. Important work has been done in Britain by Professor John Hinton and Dr. Cicely Saunders, and already two scientific journals are appearing in the United States that deal exclusively with matters pertaining to death and bereavement. france too has its "Societe de thanatologie de la langue francaise"which publishes a regular Bulletin But death(like life) is too serious a subject to be taken solemnly, and one of the most cheerful friendly places I know is a small institution in south London which specializes in the treatment of cancer patients with a prognosis of six weeks or less. Here the aim is to augment the quality rather than the quantity of the life that remains to each patient, and if there are times of sorrow and regret when patients and their families face up to the real disappointments that occur, there are also times of happiness and peace when people stop striving for unreal ends and make a good job of a real ending In this book we shall find described the way in which some American people coped with death Despite the cultural differences, they are very similar to people in the United Kingdom and there is no need for me to attempt to translate the clear exposition which Dr. Ross has given us. Others might(and probably will)adopt a different terminology when describing the phases through which the dying patient passes in the course of his illness. Since individual variation is so great,it unlikely that any one conceptual system could be applied to all. But the overall picture, and the illustrative examples on which it is based, must stand. They stand as a reproach to some,an encouragement to others. and a lesson to al This book is important reading for nurses, doctors, clergy, and others whose work brings them into contact with the dying. It is also recommended to any reader who refuses to believe that the best way to deal with fear is to run away s One has the awesome title of The Journal of Thanatology and the other Omega
"Can be"-but, too often, is not. Too many things militate against a fitting approach to death. Despite all evidence to the contrary, we insist on assuming we are immortal and assuring each other that all of us are on a space walk, immune from the laws of celestial gravity. "Don't worry," says the doctor, "it's only a little ulcer"; "Come now," says the nurse, "You mustn't talk like that, you're going to be all right." A well-rounded life should have a beginning, a middle, and an end. Not just for reasons of symmetry but because, though I may be mortal, the social system of which I am a part is immortal and my arrival into and departure from that social system are important events which need to be prepared for. Medicine should not confine itself to the prevention of death any more than family planning should confine itself to the prevention of birth. But it is, perhaps, no coincidence that the century which produced (VIII) Marie Stopes and Alexander Fleming also produced Grantly Dick Reid and Elisabeth Kubler-Ross. It seems that incipient mortality, though less easy to predict than incipient nativity, is equally a proper matter for preparation and study. Dr. Ross is not alone in her concern for those who are about to die. Important work has been done in Britain by Professor John Hinton and Dr. Cicely Saunders, and already two scientific journals are appearing in the United States that deal exclusively with matters pertaining to death and bereavement." France too has its "Societe de Thanatologie de la Langue Francaise", which publishes a regular Bulletin. But death (like life) is too serious a subject to be taken solemnly, and one of the most cheerful, friendly places I know is a small institution in south London which specializes in the treatment of cancer patients with a prognosis of six weeks or less. Here the aim is to augment the quality rather than the quantity of the life that remains to each patient, and if there are times of sorrow and regret when patients and their families face up to the real disappointments that occur, there are also times of happiness and peace when people stop striving for unreal ends and make a good job of a real ending. In this book we shall find described the way in which some American people coped with death. Despite the cultural differences, they are very similar to people in the United Kingdom and there is no need for me to attempt to translate the clear exposition which Dr. Ross has given us. Others might (and probably will) adopt a different terminology when describing the phases through which the dying patient passes in the course of his illness. Since individual variation is so great, it is unlikely that any one conceptual system could be applied to all. But the overall picture, and the illustrative examples on which it is based, must stand. They stand as a reproach to some, an encouragement to others, and a lesson to all. This book is important reading for nurses, doctors, clergy, and others whose work brings them into contact with the dying. It is also recommended to any reader who refuses to believe that the best way to deal with fear is to run away. * One has the awesome title of The Journal of Thanatology and the other Omega
There are too many people who have directly or indirectly contributed to this work to express my appreciation to them individually. Dr. Sydney Margolin deserves the credit for having stimulated the idea of interviewing terminally ill patients in the presence of students as a meaningful learning- teaching model The Department of Psychiatry at the University of Chicago Billings Hospital has supplied the environment and facilities to make such a seminar technically possible Chaplains Herman Cook and Carl Nighswonger have been helpful and stimulating co-interviewers who also have assisted in the search for patients at a time when that was immensely difficult Wayne Rydberg and the original four students by their interest and curiosity have enabled me to overcome the initial difficulties. I was also assisted by the support of the Chicago Theologic Seminary staff. Reverend Renford Gaines and his wife Harriet have spent countless hours reviewing the manuscript and have maintained my faith in the worth of this kind of undertaking. Dr C. Knight Aldrich has supported this work over the past three years Dr. Edgar Draper and Jane Kennedy reviewed part of the manuscript. Bonita McDaniel, Janet Reshkin, and Joyce Carlson deserve thanks for the typing of the chapters.Or My thanks to the many patients and their families is perhaps best expressed by the publication of their communications There are many authors who have inspired this work, and thanks should be given finally to all those who have given thought and attention to the terminally ill Thanks is given to Mr. Peter Nevraumont for suggesting the writing of this book as well as to Mr Clement Alexandre, of the Macmillan Company, for his patience and understanding while the book was in preparation Last but not least I wish to thank my husband and my children for their patience and continued support which enables me to carry on a full-time job in addition to being a wife and mother EK-R
========================= Acknowledgments There are too many people who have directly or indirectly contributed to this work to express my appreciation to them individually. Dr. Sydney Margolin deserves the credit for having stimulated the idea of interviewing terminally ill patients in the presence of students as a meaningful learningteaching model. The Department of Psychiatry at the University of Chicago Billings Hospital has supplied the environment and facilities to make such a seminar technically possible. Chaplains Herman Cook and Carl Nighswonger have been helpful and stimulating co-interviewers, who also have assisted in the search for patients at a time when that was immensely difficult. Wayne Rydberg and the original four students by their interest and curiosity have enabled me to overcome the initial difficulties. I was also assisted by the support of the Chicago Theological Seminary staff. Reverend Renford Gaines and his wife Harriet have spent countless hours reviewing the manuscript and have maintained my faith in the worth of this kind of undertaking. Dr. C. Knight Aldrich has supported this work over the past three years. Dr. Edgar Draper and Jane Kennedy reviewed part of the manuscript. Bonita McDaniel, Janet Reshkin, and Joyce Carlson deserve thanks for the typing of the chapters. My thanks to the many patients and their families is perhaps best expressed by the publication of their communications. There are many authors who have inspired this work, and thanks should be given finally to all those who have given thought and attention to the terminally ill. Thanks is given to Mr. Peter Nevraumont for suggesting the writing of this book as well as to Mr. Clement Alexandre, of the Macmillan Company, for his patience and understanding while the book was in preparation. (x) Last but not least I wish to thank my husband and my children for their patience and continued support which enables me to carry on a full-time job in addition to being a wife and mother. E. K-R. ========================= Preface
When I was asked if I would be willing to write a book on death and dying, I enthusiastically accepted the challenge. When I actually sat down and began to wonder what I had got myself into strangers who are going to read this book, how much can I share from this experience witho y to it became a different matter. Where do i begin? what do i include? How much can I sa patients? How many things are communicated nonverbally and have to be felt, experienced, seen and can hardly be translated into words? I have worked with dying patients for the past two and a half years and this book will tell about the beginning of this experiment, which turned out to be a meaningful and instructive experience for all participants. It is not meant to be a textbook on how to manage dying patients, nor is it intended as a complete study of the psychology of the dying. It is simply an account of a new and challenging opportunity to refocus on the patient as a human being, to include him in dialogues, to learn from him the strengths and weaknesses of our hospital management of the patient. We have asked him to be our teacher so that we may learn more about the final stages of life with all its anxieties, fears, and hopes. I am simply telling the stories of my patients who shared their agonies, their expectations, and their frustrations with us. It is hoped that it will encourage others not to shy away from the"hopelessly"sick but to get closer to them, as they can help them much during their final hours. The few who can do this will also discover that it can be a mutually gratifying experience they will learn much about the functioning of the human mind, the unique human aspects of our existence,and will emerge from the experience enriched and perhaps with fewer anxieties about heir own finality E.K-R On the Fear of Death Let me not pray to be sheltered from dangers but to be fearless in facing them Let me not beg for the stilling of my pain but for the heart to conquer it Let me not look for allies in life' s battlefield but to my own strength et me not crave in anxious fear to be saved but hope for the patience to win my freedom Grant me that 1 may not be a coward, feeling your mercy in my success alone, but let me find the grasp of your hand in my failure Rabindranath Tagore, Fruit-Gathering
When I was asked if I would be willing to write a book on death and dying, I enthusiastically accepted the challenge. When I actually sat down and began to wonder what I had got myself into, it became a different matter. Where do I begin? What do I include? How much can I say to strangers who are going to read this book, how much can I share from this experience with dying patients? How many things are communicated nonverbally and have to be felt, experienced, seen, and can hardly be translated into words? I have worked with dying patients for the past two and a half years and this book will tell about the beginning of this experiment, which turned out to be a meaningful and instructive experience for all participants. It is not meant to be a textbook on how to manage dying patients, nor is it intended as a complete study of the psychology of the dying. It is simply an account of a new and challenging opportunity to refocus on the patient as a human being, to include him in dialogues, to learn from him the strengths and weaknesses of our hospital management of the patient. We have asked him to be our teacher so that we may learn more about the final stages of life with all its anxieties, fears, and hopes. I am simply telling the stories of my patients who shared their agonies, their expectations, and their frustrations with us. It is hoped that it will encourage others not to shy away from the "hopelessly" sick but to get closer to them, as they can help them much during their final hours. The few who can do this will also discover that it can be a mutually gratifying experience; they will learn much about the functioning of the human mind, the unique human aspects of our existence, and will emerge from the experience enriched and perhaps with fewer anxieties about their own finality. E. K.-R. ========================= (I) On the Fear of Death Let me not pray to be sheltered from dangers but to be fearless in facing them. Let me not beg for the stilling of my pain but for the heart to conquer it. Let me not look for allies in life's battlefield but to my own strength. Let me not crave in anxious fear to be saved but hope for the patience to win my freedom. Grant me that 1 may not be a coward, feeling your mercy in my success alone; but let me find the grasp of your hand in my failure. Rabindranath Tagore, Fruit-Gathering
Epidemics have taken a great toll of lives in past generations. Death in infancy and early childhood was frequent and there were few families who did not lose a member at an early age. Medicine has changed greatly in the last decades. Widespread vaccination has practically eradicated many illnesses, at least in western Europe and the United States. The use of chemotherapy, especially the antibiotics, has contributed to an ever decreasing number of fatalities in infectious diseases. Better child care and education have effected a low morbidity and mortality among children. The many diseases that used to take an impressive toll among the young and middle-aged have been conquered. The number of old people is on the rise, and, as a result, there is an increasing number of people with malignancies and chronic diseases associated particularly with old age Paediatricians have less work with acute and life-threatening situations but they see an ever increasing number of patients suffering from psychosomatic disturbances and from adjustment and behaviour problems. Physicians have more people in their waiting rooms with emotional problems than they have ever had before, but they also have more elderly patients who not only try to live with their decreased physical abilities and their limitations but who also face loneliness and isolation with all its pains and anguish. The majority of these people are not seen by a psychiatrist Their needs have to be elicited and gratified by other professional people, for instance, chaplains and social workers. It is for them that I am trying to outline the changes that have taken place in the last few decades, changes that are ultimately responsible for an increased fear of death through unfamiliarity, the rising number of emotional problems, and the greater need for understanding of and coping with the problems of death and dying When we look back in time and study former cultures and peoples, we are impressed that death has always been distasteful to man and will probably always be. To a psychiatrist this is very understandable and can perhaps best be explained in terms of our understanding of the unconscious parts of the self; to the unconscious mind, death is never possible in regard to ourselves. It is inconceivable for our unconscious to imagine an actual ending of our own life here on earth, and if this life of ours has to end, the ending is always attributed to a malicious intervention from the outside by someone else. In simple terms, in our unconscious mind we can only be killed it is inconceivable to die of i a natural cause or of old age. Therefore death in itself is associated with a bad act, a frightening happening, something that in itself calls for retribution and punishment One is wise to remember these fundamental facts because they are essential in understanding some of the most important, but otherwise unintelligible, communications of our patients The second fact that we have to comprehend is that in our unconscious mind we cannot distinguish between a wish and a deed We can all recall illogical dreams in which two completely opposite statements occur side by side-very acceptable in our dreams but unthinkable in our waking state just as we, in our unconscious minds cannot differentiate between the wish to kill somebody in anger and the act of killing, so the young child is unable to distinguish between fantasy and reality The child who angrily wishes his mother to drop dead for not having gratified his needs will be traumatized greatly by her actual death-even if this event is not linked closely in time with his destructive wishes. He will always take part or all the blame for the loss of his mother. He will a ways say to himself-rarely to others-"I did it, I am responsible, I was bad, therefore Mommy lef me. It is well to remember that the child will react in the same manner if he loses a parent by
Epidemics have taken a great toll of lives in past generations. Death in infancy and early childhood was frequent and there were few families who did not lose a member at an early age. Medicine has changed greatly in the last decades. Widespread vaccination has practically eradicated many illnesses, at least in western Europe and the United States. The use of chemotherapy, especially the antibiotics, has contributed to an ever decreasing number of fatalities in infectious diseases. Better child care and education have effected a low morbidity and mortality among children. The many diseases that used to take an impressive toll among the young and middle-aged have been conquered. The number of old people is on the rise, and, as a result, there is an increasing number of people with malignancies and chronic diseases associated particularly with old age. Paediatricians have less work with acute and life-threatening situations but they see an ever increasing number of patients suffering from psychosomatic disturbances and from adjustment and behaviour problems. Physicians have more people in their waiting rooms with emotional problems than they have ever had before, but they also have more elderly patients who not only try to live with their decreased physical abilities and their limitations but who also face loneliness and isolation with all its pains and anguish. The majority of these people are not seen by a psychiatrist. Their needs have to be elicited and gratified by other professional people, for instance, chaplains and social workers. It is for them that I am trying to outline the changes that have taken place in the last few decades, changes that are ultimately responsible for an increased fear of death through unfamiliarity, the rising number of emotional problems, and the greater need for understanding of and coping with the problems of death and dying. When we look back in time and study former cultures and peoples, we are impressed that death has always been distasteful to man and will probably always be. To a psychiatrist this is very understandable and can perhaps best be explained in terms of our understanding of the unconscious parts of the self; to the unconscious mind, death is never possible in regard to ourselves. It is inconceivable for our unconscious to imagine an actual ending of our own life here on earth, and if this life of ours has to end, the ending is always attributed to a malicious intervention from the outside by someone else. In simple terms, in our unconscious mind we can only be killed; it is inconceivable to die of 1 a natural cause or of old age. Therefore death in itself is associated with a bad act, a frightening happening, something that in itself calls for retribution and punishment. One is wise to remember these fundamental facts because they are essential in understanding some of the most important, but otherwise unintelligible, communications of our patients. The second fact that we have to comprehend is that in our unconscious mind we cannot distinguish between a wish and a deed. We can all recall illogical dreams in which two completely opposite statements occur side by side-very acceptable in our dreams but unthinkable in our waking state. just as we, in our unconscious minds cannot differentiate between the wish to kill somebody in anger and the act of killing, so the young child is unable to distinguish between fantasy and reality. The child who angrily wishes his mother to drop dead for not having gratified his needs will be traumatized greatly by her actual death-even if this event is not linked closely in time with his destructive wishes. He will always take part or all the blame for the loss of his mother. He will always say to himself-rarely to others-"I did it, I am responsible, I was bad, therefore Mommy left me." It is well to remember that the child will react in the same manner if he loses a parent by