Molecular Biology Problem Solver: A Laboratory Guide. Edited by Alan S Gerstein ISBNS:0-471-37972-7( Paper);0-471 (Electronic) 9 Restriction endonucleases Derek Robinson, Paul R. Walsh, and joseph A. Bonventre Background Information 226 Which Restriction Enzymes Are Commercially Why Are Some Enzymes More Expensive Than Others? 227 What Can You do to reduce the cost of Working with Restriction Enzymes? If You Could Select among Several Restriction Enzymes for Your Application, What Criteria Should You Consider to Make the Most Appropriate Choice? 229 What Are the General Properties of Restriction Endonucleases? 232 What Insight Is Provided by a Restriction Enzyme's Quality Control data? .233 How Stable Are Restriction Enzymes How Stable Are Diluted Restriction Enzymes 236 Simple Digests How Should You Set up a Simple Restriction Digest?... 236 ls It Wise to Modify the Suggested Reaction Conditions? 237 Complex Restriction Dige Should You Alter the Reaction Volume and DNAst...239 How Can a Substrate Affect the restriction Dige Concentration? ...24 Double Digests: Simultaneous or Sequential? 225
225 9 Restriction Endonucleases Derek Robinson, Paul R. Walsh, and Joseph A. Bonventre Background Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 226 Which Restriction Enzymes Are Commercially Available? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 226 Why Are Some Enzymes More Expensive Than Others? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227 What Can You Do to Reduce the Cost of Working with Restriction Enzymes? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228 If You Could Select among Several Restriction Enzymes for Your Application, What Criteria Should You Consider to Make the Most Appropriate Choice? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229 What Are the General Properties of Restriction Endonucleases? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232 What Insight Is Provided by a Restriction Enzyme’s Quality Control Data? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233 How Stable Are Restriction Enzymes? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 236 How Stable Are Diluted Restriction Enzymes? . . . . . . . . . . . 236 Simple Digests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 236 How Should You Set up a Simple Restriction Digest? . . . . . 236 Is It Wise to Modify the Suggested Reaction Conditions? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237 Complex Restriction Digestions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239 How Can a Substrate Affect the Restriction Digest? . . . . . 239 Should You Alter the Reaction Volume and DNA Concentration? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241 Double Digests: Simultaneous or Sequential? . . . . . . . . . . . . 242 Molecular Biology Problem Solver: A Laboratory Guide. Edited by Alan S. Gerstein Copyright © 2001 by Wiley-Liss, Inc. ISBNs: 0-471-37972-7 (Paper); 0-471-22390-5 (Electronic)
Genomic Digests When Preparing Genomic DNA for Southern Blotting, How Can You Determine If Complete Digestion Has Been Obtained? 244 What Are Your Options If You Must Create Additional Rare or Unique Restriction Sites? 247 Troubleshooting∴. 255 What Can Cause a Simple Restriction Digest to Fail? 255 The Volume of Enzyme in the Vial Appears Very Low. Did eakage Occur during Shipment The Enzyme Shipment Sat on the Shipping Dock for Analyzing Transformation Failure and Other Multiple-Step procedures Involving Restriction Enzymes 260 Bibliography .262 BACKGROUND INFORMATION Molecular biologists routinely use restriction enzymes as ke eagents for a variety of applications including genomic mapping, restriction fragment length polymorphism(RFLP)analysis, DNA sequencing, and a host of recombinant DNA methodologies. Few would argue that these enzymes are not indispensable tools for the variety of techniques used in the manipulation of DNA, but like many common tools that are easy to use, they are not always applied as efficiently and effectively as possible. This chapter focuses on the biochemical attributes and requirements of re striction enzymes and delivers strategies to optimize their use in mple and complex reactions Which Restriction Enzymes Are Commercially Available? While as many as six to eight types of restriction endonucleases have been described in the literature Class li restriction endonu cleases are the best known, commercially available and the most useful. These enzymes recognize specific DNA sequences cleave each DNA strand to generate termini with 5 phosphate and 3 hydroxyl groups. For the vast majority of enzymes charac- terized to date within this class, the recognition sequence is nor mally four to eight base pairs in length and palindromic. The point of cleavage is within the recognition sequence. A variation on th theme appears in the case of Class IIS restriction endonucleases. 226 Robinson et al
Genomic Digests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244 When Preparing Genomic DNA for Southern Blotting, How Can You Determine If Complete Digestion Has Been Obtained? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244 What Are Your Options If You Must Create Additional Rare or Unique Restriction Sites? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 247 Troubleshooting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 255 What Can Cause a Simple Restriction Digest to Fail? . . . . 255 The Volume of Enzyme in the Vial Appears Very Low. Did Leakage Occur during Shipment? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 259 The Enzyme Shipment Sat on the Shipping Dock for Two Days. Is It still Active? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 259 Analyzing Transformation Failure and Other Multiple-Step Procedures Involving Restriction Enzymes . . . . . . . . . . . . 260 Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262 BACKGROUND INFORMATION Molecular biologists routinely use restriction enzymes as key reagents for a variety of applications including genomic mapping, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis, DNA sequencing, and a host of recombinant DNA methodologies. Few would argue that these enzymes are not indispensable tools for the variety of techniques used in the manipulation of DNA, but like many common tools that are easy to use, they are not always applied as efficiently and effectively as possible. This chapter focuses on the biochemical attributes and requirements of restriction enzymes and delivers strategies to optimize their use in simple and complex reactions. Which Restriction Enzymes Are Commercially Available? While as many as six to eight types of restriction endonucleases have been described in the literature, Class II restriction endonucleases are the best known, commercially available and the most useful. These enzymes recognize specific DNA sequences and cleave each DNA strand to generate termini with 5¢ phosphate and 3¢ hydroxyl groups. For the vast majority of enzymes characterized to date within this class, the recognition sequence is normally four to eight base pairs in length and palindromic.The point of cleavage is within the recognition sequence. A variation on this theme appears in the case of Class IIS restriction endonucleases. 226 Robinson et al
These recognize nonpalindromic sequences, typically four to seven base pairs in length, and the point of cleavage may vary from within the recognition sequence up to 20 base pairs away (Szybalski et aL., 1991) To date, nearly 250 unique restriction specificities have been discovered(Roberts and Macelis, 2001). New prototype activi- ties are continually being discovered. The Rebase database (http://rebase.neb.comprovidesmonthlyupdatesdetailingnew recognition specificities as well as commercial availability These enzymes naturally occur in thousands of bacterial strains and presumably function as the cells defense against bacterio phage DNA. Nomenclature for restriction enzymes is based on a convention using the first letter of the genus and the first two letters of the species name of the bacteria of origin. For example Sacl and Sacll are derived from Streptomyces achromogenes Of the bacterial strains screened for these enzymes to date, well over two thousand restriction endonucleases have been identified each recognizing a sequence specificity defined by one of the prototype activities. Restriction enzymes isolated from distinct bacterial strains having the same recognition specificity are known as isoschizomers (e.g, SacI and SstI). Isoschizomers that cleave the same DNa sequence at a different position are known as neoschizomers(e.g, Smal and Xmal) Why Are Some Enzymes More Expensive Than Others? The distribution of list prices for any given restriction enzyme can vary among commercial suppliers. This is due to many factors cluding the cost of production, quality assurance, packaging, import duties, and freight. For many commonly available enzymes produced from native overexpressors or recombinant sources, the cost of production is relatively low and is generally a minor factor in the final price. Recombinant enzymes(typically over expressed in a well-characterized E. coli host strain) are often less expensive than their nonrecombinant counterparts due to high yields and the resulting efficiencies in production and purifi cation. In contrast, those enzyme preparations resulting in very low yields are often difficult to purify, and they have significantly higher production costs. In general, these enzymes tend to be dra- matically more expensive (per unit of activity) than those isolated from the more robust sources. As these enzymes may not be avail able at the same unit activity levels of the more common enzymes, they can be less forgiving in nonoptimal reaction conditions, Restriction Endonucleases 227
These recognize nonpalindromic sequences, typically four to seven base pairs in length, and the point of cleavage may vary from within the recognition sequence up to 20 base pairs away (Szybalski et al., 1991). To date, nearly 250 unique restriction specificities have been discovered (Roberts and Macelis, 2001). New prototype activities are continually being discovered. The REBASE database (http://rebase.neb.com) provides monthly updates detailing new recognition specificities as well as commercial availability. These enzymes naturally occur in thousands of bacterial strains and presumably function as the cell’s defense against bacteriophage DNA. Nomenclature for restriction enzymes is based on a convention using the first letter of the genus and the first two letters of the species name of the bacteria of origin. For example, SacI and SacII are derived from Streptomyces achromogenes. Of the bacterial strains screened for these enzymes to date, well over two thousand restriction endonucleases have been identified— each recognizing a sequence specificity defined by one of the prototype activities. Restriction enzymes isolated from distinct bacterial strains having the same recognition specificity are known as isoschizomers (e.g., SacI and SstI). Isoschizomers that cleave the same DNA sequence at a different position are known as neoschizomers (e.g., SmaI and XmaI). Why Are Some Enzymes More Expensive Than Others? The distribution of list prices for any given restriction enzyme can vary among commercial suppliers. This is due to many factors including the cost of production, quality assurance, packaging, import duties, and freight. For many commonly available enzymes produced from native overexpressors or recombinant sources, the cost of production is relatively low and is generally a minor factor in the final price. Recombinant enzymes (typically overexpressed in a well-characterized E. coli host strain) are often less expensive than their nonrecombinant counterparts due to high yields and the resulting efficiencies in production and purifi- cation. In contrast, those enzyme preparations resulting in very low yields are often difficult to purify, and they have significantly higher production costs. In general, these enzymes tend to be dramatically more expensive (per unit of activity) than those isolated from the more robust sources.As these enzymes may not be available at the same unit activity levels of the more common enzymes, they can be less forgiving in nonoptimal reaction conditions, Restriction Endonucleases 227
and can be more problematic with initial use. The important point is that the relative price of a given restriction enzyme(or isoschizomer) may not be the best barometer of its performance in a specific application or procedure. The enzyme with the highest price does not necessarily guarantee optimal performance; nor does the one with the lowest price consistently translate into the best valu Most commercial suppliers maintain a set of quality assurance standards that each product must pass in order to be approved for release. These standards are typically described in the supplier's product catalogs and detailed in the Certificate of Analysis. When planning to use an enzyme for the first time, it is important to review the corresponding quality control specifications and any usage notes regarding recommended conditions and applications. What Can You Do to Reduce the Cost of working with Restriction Enzymes? Most common restriction enzymes are relatively inexpensiv and often maintain full activity past the designated expiration date. Restriction enzymes of high purity are often stable for many years when stored at -20C. In order to maximize the shelf life of less stable enzymes, many laboratories utilize insulated storage containers to mitigate the effects of freezer temperature fluctua tions. Periodic summary titration of outdated enzymes for activ ity is another way to reduce costs for these reagents. For most applications, 1 ul is used to digest 250ng to l ug of DNA. Enzymes supplied in higher concentrations may be diluted prior to the reac tion in the appropriate storage buffer. A final dilution range of 2000 to 5000 Umits/ml is recommended. However, reducing the amount of enzyme added to the reaction may increase the risk of incomplete digestion with insignificant savings in cost. Dilution is a more practical option when using very expensive enzymes, when sample DNA concentration is below 250ng per reaction, or when partial digestion is required. When planning for partial digestion erial dilution(discussed below) is recommended. Most diluted enzymes should be stable for long periods of time when stored at 20%C. as a rule it is wise to estimate the amount of diluted enzyme required over the next week and prepare the dilution he appropriate storage buffer, accordingly. For immediate use, most restriction enzymes can be diluted in the reaction buffer, kept on ice, and used for the day. Extending the reaction time to greater than one hour can often be used to save enzyme or ensure complete digestion Robinson et al
and can be more problematic with initial use. The important point is that the relative price of a given restriction enzyme (or isoschizomer) may not be the best barometer of its performance in a specific application or procedure.The enzyme with the highest price does not necessarily guarantee optimal performance; nor does the one with the lowest price consistently translate into the best value. Most commercial suppliers maintain a set of quality assurance standards that each product must pass in order to be approved for release.These standards are typically described in the supplier’s product catalogs and detailed in the Certificate of Analysis. When planning to use an enzyme for the first time, it is important to review the corresponding quality control specifications and any usage notes regarding recommended conditions and applications. What Can You Do to Reduce the Cost of Working with Restriction Enzymes? Most common restriction enzymes are relatively inexpensive and often maintain full activity past the designated expiration date. Restriction enzymes of high purity are often stable for many years when stored at -20°C. In order to maximize the shelf life of less stable enzymes, many laboratories utilize insulated storage containers to mitigate the effects of freezer temperature fluctuations. Periodic summary titration of outdated enzymes for activity is another way to reduce costs for these reagents. For most applications, 1ml is used to digest 250 ng to 1mg of DNA. Enzymes supplied in higher concentrations may be diluted prior to the reaction in the appropriate storage buffer. A final dilution range of 2000 to 5000 Umits/ml is recommended. However, reducing the amount of enzyme added to the reaction may increase the risk of incomplete digestion with insignificant savings in cost. Dilution is a more practical option when using very expensive enzymes, when sample DNA concentration is below 250 ng per reaction, or when partial digestion is required. When planning for partial digestion, serial dilution (discussed below) is recommended. Most diluted enzymes should be stable for long periods of time when stored at -20°C. As a rule it is wise to estimate the amount of diluted enzyme required over the next week and prepare the dilution in the appropriate storage buffer, accordingly. For immediate use, most restriction enzymes can be diluted in the reaction buffer, kept on ice, and used for the day. Extending the reaction time to greater than one hour can often be used to save enzyme or ensure complete digestion. 228 Robinson et al
If You Could Select among Several Restriction Enzymes for Your Application, What Criteria Should You Consider to Make the Most Appropriate Choice? Each restriction endonuclease is a unique enzyme with individ- ual characteristics, which are usually listed in suppliers'catalogs and package inserts. When using an unfamiliar enzyme, these data should be carefully reviewed. In addition some enzymes provide additional activities that may impact the immediate or down- stream application. Ease of Use For many applications it is desirable and convenient to use 1ul per reaction. Most suppliers offer standard enzyme concentrations ranging from 2000 to 20,000 units/ml(2-20 units/ul). In addition many suppliers also offer these enzymes in high concentration (often up to 100,000 units/ml), either as a standard product, or through special order. Enzymes sold at 10 to 20 units/ul are common and usually lend themselves for use in a wider variety of applications. When planning to use enzymes available only in lower concentrations(near 2000 units/ml), be sure to take the final glycerol concentration and reaction volume into account. B following the recommended conditions and maintaining the final glycerol concentration below 5%, you can easily avoid star activit ty. Star Activity When subjected to reaction conditions at the extremes of their operating range, restriction endonucleases are capable of cleaving sequences that are similar, but not identical, to their canonical recognition sequences. This altered specificity has been termed "star activity. Star sites are related to the recognition site, usually differing by one or more bases. The propensity for exhibiting star activity varies considerably among restriction endonucleases. For a given enzyme, star activity will be exhibited at the same relative level in each lot produced, whether isolated from a recombinant or a nonrecombinant source Star activity was first reported for EcoRi incubated in a low ionic strength high pH buffer(Polisky et al., 1975). Under these conditions, while this enzyme would cleave at its canonical site (G/AATTC), it also recognized and cleaved at N/AATTC. This reduced specificity should be a consideration when planning to use a restriction endonuclease in a nonoptimal buffer. It was also found that substituting Mn**for Mg+ can result in star activity Restriction Endonucleases
If You Could Select among Several Restriction Enzymes for Your Application,What Criteria Should You Consider to Make the Most Appropriate Choice? Each restriction endonuclease is a unique enzyme with individual characteristics, which are usually listed in suppliers’ catalogs and package inserts. When using an unfamiliar enzyme, these data should be carefully reviewed. In addition some enzymes provide additional activities that may impact the immediate or downstream application. Ease of Use For many applications it is desirable and convenient to use 1ml per reaction. Most suppliers offer standard enzyme concentrations ranging from 2000 to 20,000 units/ml (2–20 units/ml). In addition many suppliers also offer these enzymes in high concentration (often up to 100,000 units/ml), either as a standard product, or through special order. Enzymes sold at 10 to 20 units/ml are common and usually lend themselves for use in a wider variety of applications. When planning to use enzymes available only in lower concentrations (near 2000 units/ml), be sure to take the final glycerol concentration and reaction volume into account. By following the recommended conditions and maintaining the final glycerol concentration below 5%, you can easily avoid star activity. Star Activity When subjected to reaction conditions at the extremes of their operating range, restriction endonucleases are capable of cleaving sequences that are similar, but not identical, to their canonical recognition sequences. This altered specificity has been termed “star activity.” Star sites are related to the recognition site, usually differing by one or more bases. The propensity for exhibiting star activity varies considerably among restriction endonucleases. For a given enzyme, star activity will be exhibited at the same relative level in each lot produced, whether isolated from a recombinant or a nonrecombinant source. Star activity was first reported for EcoRI incubated in a low ionic strength high pH buffer (Polisky et al., 1975). Under these conditions, while this enzyme would cleave at its canonical site (G/AATTC), it also recognized and cleaved at N/AATTC. This reduced specificity should be a consideration when planning to use a restriction endonuclease in a nonoptimal buffer. It was also found that substituting Mn2+ for Mg2+ can result in star activity Restriction Endonucleases 229