Academic Communication in English Peer review and revision
Academic Communication in English Peer review and revision
Purpose of Peer-Review and Revision make you write with a real audience in mind, which can motivate you to compose an acceptable draft explain and defend your ideas,which helps clarify and develop the ideas be more sensitive to the strengths and weaknesses when you critically review other people's work
Purpose of Peer-Review and Revision make you write with a real audience in mind, which can motivate you to compose an acceptable draft explain and defend your ideas, which helps clarify and develop the ideas be more sensitive to the strengths and weaknesses when you critically review other people’s work 3 2 1
⑧ A summary of our lectures on academic writing
A summary of our lectures on academic writing
Checklist for peer review and revision How many words are there?(3000-4000) Are there grammatical mistakes?Is the language clear and succinct? Are all the borrowed ideas provided with citations and reference?Is there a match in citations and references? Are the citations and reference in APA format?Are the referenced in alphabetic order? Does the title clearly identify the field of the research and have shown a logical relationship?
Checklist for peer review and revision How many words are there? (3000-4000) Are all the borrowed ideas provided with citations and reference? Is there a match in citations and references? Are the citations and reference in APA format? Are the referenced in alphabetic order? Does the title clearly identify the field of the research and have shown a logical relationship? 4 2 1 3 Are there grammatical mistakes? Is the language clear and succinct?
Peer-Review and Revision Does the abstract include essentials of background, problem,method,result,conclusion? Are there three moves (background,problem/gap, purpose/thesis/filing the gap)in the introduction? Are there too many subtitles? Does the paper have a logical outline,which meet 8 the requirements of parallelism,coordination, subordination and division?
Peer-Review and Revision Are there three moves (background, problem/gap, purpose/thesis/filing the gap) in the introduction? Are there too many subtitles? Does the paper have a logical outline, which meet the requirements of parallelism, coordination, subordination and division? 8 7 6 5 Does the abstract include essentials of background, problem, method, result, conclusion?