提纲: 什么是系统综述?与传统的区别 系统综述的步骤 ●系统综述的评价
提纲： 什么是系统综述？与传统的区别 系统综述的步骤 系统综述的评价
SR步骤(2008c0 chane sr手册) 建立一个规范化的问题 制定纳入研究的标准 检索研究 只有当研究 4.筛选研究和收集数据 质量足够好 5.研究质量的严格评阅 6.分析数据并在可能的情况下进行meta-分析 7.解决报告的偏倚 8.陈述结果并制作结果摘要表格 9.解释结果,得出结论 10.完善和定期更新SR
SR步骤（2008 Cochrane SR 手册） 1. 建立一个规范化的问题 2. 制定纳入研究的标准 3. 检索研究 4. 筛选研究和收集数据 5. 研究质量的严格评阅 6. 分析数据并在可能的情况下进行meta-分析 7. 解决报告的偏倚 8. 陈述结果并制作结果摘要表格 9. 解释结果，得出结论 10. 完善和定期更新SR
注册申请 回圃出100的回关闭c TITLE REGISTRATION FORM THE COCHRANE COCHRANE COLORECTAL CANCER GROUP Please complete and E-mail this form to HKA02@bbh region. dk Henning Keinke Andersen, Review Group Co-ordinator, Cochane Colorectal Cancer Group Before ess, we strongly suggest that you consult the Cochrane ane orgfresources/handbook/index htm or Tips for reviewers at our homel Proposed Title Oral traditional chinese medication for adhesive small bowel obstruction Description of proposal There is no review or registered protocol in Cochrane Database about this topic (a)objective This review aim to assess the efficacy and safety of oral traditional Chi nese medicine for adhesive small bowel obstruction I( b)Rationale for review Small bowel obstruction(SBO)is a common problem in general surgery. It is mainly followed n the postoperative period and also occurred in other injured factors (e.g. blunt abdomen njury or infection peritonitis ), Patients with adhesive small-bowel obstruction are usually managed conservatively, receiving intravenous hydration and nothing by mouth (NPO Previous studies have suggested that this approach is associated w全屏是示 tal stay and an increased risk of delayed surgery. NPO is the standard tred关闭全屏显示c) Aall-bowel obstruction. Whether oral medications TCM herbs, e.g. Da-Cheng hibited during treatment of adhesi ve small-bowel obstruction is uncle c)Types of study
注册申请
当卧191·哈国关闭c need an initial search to fill out the "S uggested scoping search perform within protocols I. Number of citations identified from search of one database Anticipated number of database in search Estimated total seach 2. Anticipated study type in final Non-randomised comparative studies bservational (aetdiogical) sudies Diagnostc accuracy studie Prognostic studies Mixed please specify. others ease specify 3. Estimated numbe of eligible studies in final analysis 5□510 Roles and responsibilities: N is important that authors agree between the ealy stage how each will contribue to the final review. Please discuss the various tasks listed elow with your co-authors and specify TASK WHO HAS AGREED TO UNDERTAKE THE TASK? Tao Suo, Roland Andersson xinyu oin Develop a search strategy Tsc at CCcG Search for trials Xixi Gu Tao SUo Extract data from trias nter data in ReyMan Gu, Boheng Zhag Camp out the analys Xix Gu, Boheng Zhag Interpret the analysis Tao suo, Roland Andersson, Xinyu Qin Drat the final review Tao suo, Roland Andersson Xinyu ain Provisional dates for submission of drafts to editorial base (A)Draft PROTOCOL 201003-01 全屏显 (B)Draft REVIEW 20110801 关闭全屏
系统综述的要求 应用明确的,透明的方法合成相关的 研究,允许别人评价,批评,或重复 系统综述按固定的程式进行,报道时 也有固定的程式。 (Petrosino et al 1999)
系统综述的要求 应用明确的，透明的方法合成相关的 研究，允许别人评价，批评，或重复。 系统综述按固定的程式进行，报道时 也有固定的程式。 (Petrosino et al 1999)