3.Morphology 3.1 Introduction The morphology of polymers,as defined in the Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering [761,is concerned with the shape,arrangement and function of crystals alone or embedded in the solid.Polymers are either homogeneous amorphous or heterogeneous semi- crystalline [76.77.1681.Amorphous thermoplastics do not contain crystalline structures while semi-crystalline thermoplastics are characterized by the presence of ordered crystalline regions as well as amorphous regions.The term crystalline polymer always implies partially crystalline.The degree of crystallinity may be as high as 60-65%in some cases [771. The influence of morphology on the properties of composites is a major issue with semi- crystalline thermoplastic based composites.A great deal of research has been devoted in studying morphology-processing and morphology-property relationships with PEEK and PPS matrices and their composites [58,106-113,130.135.169-173].In this section,the factors influencing the morphology of semi-crystalline thermoplastics such as processing conditions and the presence of fbres,as well as the interrelationships between morphology and properties are presented. 3.2 Factors Influencing Morphology of Semi-Crystalline Thermoplastics 3.2.1 Processing Conditions Many factors can influence the morphology of semi-crystalline thermoplastics including copolymer(s),molecular weight,presence of other materlals (nucleating agents. impurities,fibres,etc.)and processing conditions(temperature at melt and the time it is held at this temperature,cool-down rate,etc.)[170].An irregular chemical structure such as chain biaucling may prevent the formation of ordered regions [921.But in other cases.crystalliza- tion may be impeded for kinetic reasons despite a regular chemical structure of the chain molecules.For example,the normal recommended cooling rates to achieve optimum composite properties with PEEK matrix are between 10 and 700C/minute [111,174).In this range,there is little variation in the degree of crystallinity (25 to 30%).At coollng rates lower than 10 C/min,degrees of crystallinity in excess of 35%will be achieved which wul result in some reduction in toughness.At cooling rates greater than 700C/minute.growth of spherulites (crystalline texture of melting crystallized polymer [173))will be incomplete and the optimum level of crystallinity will not be reached and some reduction in stiffness and resistance to hostile solvents may result.At a cooling rate greater than 2000C/minute.PEEK matrix will be essentially amorphous.However.a satisfactory degree of crystallinity can still be attained by a second stage of post-annealing in the range of 200-300C for about 20 minutes to achieve the optimum level of crystallinity and performance 11741.Figure 13 shows the 53
3. Morphology 3.1 Introduction The morphology of polymers, as defined in the Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering [76]. is concerned with the shape, arrangement and function of crystals alone or embedded in the soltd. Polymers are either homogeneous amorphous or heterogeneous semicrystalline [76. 77. 1681. Amorphous thermoplastics do not contain crystalline structures while semi-crystalline thermoplastics are characterized by the presence of ordered crystalline regions as well as amorphous regions. The term crystalline polymer always implies partially crystalline. The degree of crystahinity may be as high as 60-65% in some cases [77]. The influence of morphology on the properties of composites is a major issue with semicrystalline thermoplastic based composites. A great deal of research has been devoted in studying morphology-processing and morphology-property relationships with PEEK and PPS matrices and their composites [58, 106 - 113, 130, 135, 169 - 1731. In this section, the factors influencing the morphology of semi-crystalline thermoplastics such as processing conditions and the presence of fibres. as well as the interrelationships between morphology and properties are presented. 3.2 Factors Influencing Morphology of Semi-Crystalline Thermoplastics 3.2.1 Processing Conditions Many factors can influence the morphology of semi-crystalline thermoplastics including copolymer(s), molecular weight, presence of other materials (nucleating agents, impurities, fibres, etc.) and processing conditions (temperature at melt and the time it is held at this temperature, cool-down rate, etc.) (1701. An irregular chemical structure such as chain branching may prevent the formation of ordered regions 1921. But in other cases, crystallization may be impeded for kinetic reasons despite a regular chemical structure of the chain molecules. For example, the normal recommended cooling rates to achieve optimum composite properties with PEEK matrix are between 10 and 700” C/ minute [ 111. 1741. In this range, there is little variation in the degree of crystallinity (25 to 30%). At cooling rates lower than 10” C/ mtn. degrees of crystallinity in excess of 35% will be achieved which will result in some reduction in toughness. At cooling rates greater than 700” C/minute, growth of spherulites (crystalline texture of melting crystallized polymer [173]) will be incomplete and the optimum level of crystallinity will not be reached and some reduction in stiffness and resistance to hostile solvents may result. At a cooling rate greater than 2000’ C/minute, PEEK matrix will be essentially amorphous. However, a satisfactory degree of crystallinity can still be attained by a second stage of post-annealing in the range of 200-300” C for about 20 minutes to achieve the optimum level of crystallinity and performance [174]. Figure 13 shows the 53
54 High Performance Thermoplastic Resins and Their Composites 80 70 60 50 40 2 13 10 30100300 1000 Cooling Rate,C/Min FIGURE 13.I Degree of Crystallinity of PEEK as a Function of Cooling Rate [111] % PEEK 20 X PEEK 450P [171] ● PEEK150P[108) wl w 1ul d ul tw 37.7 3770 Coollng Rate,C/Min FIGURE 14.Degree of Crystallinity of PEEK as a Function of Cooling Rate [108]
54 High Performance Thermoplastic Resins and Their Composites 80 70 . .2 50 g z 40 E 30 20 10 Cooling Rate, WMin FIGURE 13. Degree of Crystallinity of PEEK as a Function of Cooling Rate [l 111 4oq 0 1 PEEK X l X X x . x PEEK 450P [I711 l PEEK SOP [108] ll X 0 ’ ’ ’ “““’ ’ ’ ““‘1’ ’ ’ “““’ ’ ’ “““’ ’ ’ 1’1’1” ’ ’ “‘U 1 37.7 3770 Cooling Rate, WMin FIGURE 14. Degree of Crystallinity of PEEK as a Function of Cooling Rate [108]
Morphology 55 degree of crystallinity of neat PEEK resin as a function of cooling rate obtained by Blundell et al.[111]while Figure 14 presents results obtained by Talbott et al.[108]and Velisaris and Seferis [1711.A high cooling rate leads to lower crystalline contents in the final product. Successful models have been developed which estimate the degree of crystallinity of a semi- crystalliue thernoplasuc composite from a known cooling history [107,112]. Processing cycles not only affect the degree of crystallinity but also the spherulite size [1,135.175].Table 17 shows the effect of cooling rate on spherulite size of PEEK resin.A low cooling rate results in the formation of large spherulites while smaller spherulites can be formed by fast cooling.The same observations have been made for PPS resin (135].It was also found that by annealing amorphous PPS above Tg(95 C).small crystallites can then be formed [1351. Crystallinity is also influenced by other processing parameters such as the lemperature to which the polymer is heated and the time it is held there [100,130,135,172.173].A temperature high enough to melt all the crystalline material formed during previous thermal treatments has to be chosen when processing semi-crystalline thermoplastics [58.1121.This ensures a completely amorphous structure and allows the obtention of the desired microstructure and degree of crystallinity in a subsequent processing from the melt.For PEEK,melting at 360C for 2 min and even at 380 C (for a shorter time)will leave crystalline remnants [112];and therefore a temperature of 400 C is rather recommended to ensure all crystalline material is melted. Beever et al.[135]found that varying the total residence time of the carbon/PPS composite in the mold from 7 to 20 minutes and varying the molding temperature from 291 to 360C had no effect on mechanical properties.However,Ma et al.[130]have reported that for PPS long heating times lead to lower ultimate crystallinity and may alter the molecular structure,mechanical properties and thermal stability.Table 18 presents the degree of crystallinity of PEEK versus the holding temperature at melt obtained by Xiao and Hoa [1731. Higher melt temperature leads to lower crystallinity.As mentioned by these authors,this might be of a great concern during a repair process using welding techniques.Heating is localized at the damagc arca while the surrounding arcas are subjected to lower melting temperatures resulting in undesired changes in degree of crystallinity and then mechanical properties in those surrounding areas.Figure 15 shows the degree of crystallinity of PEEK as a function of total melt annealing time at 396C obtained by Lee and Porter [110].Included in this figure are neat PEEK resin and carbon fibre relnforced PEEK that have undergone different molding conditions (pre-heating times of 30 and 100 minutes and cooling rates of 0.6 and 7 C/minute).In all cases,the degree of crystallinity decreased with increased total melt- annealing time.Crystallization on the carbon fibre tends to occur with carbon fibre reinforced
Morphology 55 degree of crystallinity of neat PEEK resin as a function of cooling rate obtained by Blundell et al. [ 11 l] while Figure 14 presents results obtained by Talbott et al. [ 1081 and Velisaris and Seferis (17 11. A high cooling rate leads to lower crystalline contents in the final product. Successful models have been developed which estimate the degree of crystallinity of a semicrystalline thermoplastic composite from a known cooling history (107, 1121. Processing cycles not only affect the degree of crystallinity but also the spherulite size 11, 135, 1751. Table 17 shows the effect of cooling rate on spherulite size of PEEK resin. A low cooling rate results in the formation of large spherulites while smaller spherulites can be formed by fast cooling. The same observations have been made for PPS resin [ 1351. It was also found that by annealing amorphous PPS above Tg (95” C], small crystallites can then be formed [135]. Crystallinity is also influenced by other processing parameters such as the temperature to which the polymer is heated and the time it is held there IlOO, 130, 135. 172. 1731. A temperature high enough to melt all the crystalline material formed during previous thermal treatments has to be chosen when processing semi-crystalline thermoplastics [58, 1121. This ensures a completely amorphous structure and allows the obtention of the desired microstructure and degree of crystallinity in a subsequent processing from the melt. For PEEK, melting at 360” C for 2 min and even at 380” C (for a shorter time) will leave crystalline remnants [112]: and therefore a temperature of 400” C is rather recommended to ensure all crystalline material is melted. Beever et al. [ 1351 found that varying the total residence time of the carbon/ PPS composite in the mold from 7 to 20 minutes and varying the molding temperature from 291 to 360” C had no effect on mechanical properties. However, Ma et al. [ 1301 have reported that for PPS long heating times lead to lower ultimate crystallinity and may alter the molecular structure, mechanical properties and thermal stability. Table 18 presents the degree of crystallinity of PEEK versus the holding temperature at melt obtained by Xiao and Hoa [ 1731. Higher melt temperature leads to lower crystallinity. As mentioned by these authors, this might be of a great concern during a repair process using welding techniques. Heating is localized at the damage area while the surrounding areas are subjected to lower melting temperatures resulting in undesired changes in degree of crystallinity and then mechanical properties in those surrounding areas. Figure 15 shows the degree of crystallinity of PEEK as a function of total melt annealing time at 396” C obtained by Lee and Porter [ 1 lo]. Included in this figure are neat PEEK resin and carbon fibre reinforced PEEK that have undergone different molding conditions (pre-heating times of 30 and 100 minutes and cooling rates of 0.6 and 7’ C/minute). In all cases, the degree of crystallinity decreased with increased total meltannealing time. Crystallization on the carbon fibre tends to occur with carbon fibre reinforced
56 High Performance Thermoplastic Resins and Their Composites TABLE 17.Effect of Processing Cycle on Spherulite Size [1] Effect on Composite Process Cycle Effect on PEEK Morphology Mechanical Performance Quench Low percent crystallinity Tough,but lower matrix modulus equals reduced compression strength Slow cool to nonoptimum Large spherulites Decreased toughness crystallization tempera- ture Fast cool to optimum Small spherulites Increased fracture crystallization tempera- toughness ture TABLE 18.Effect of Holding Temperature at Melting on the Degree of Crystallinity [173] holding temperature degree of crystallinity by WAXS by DSC 400*c 0.26 0.26 370'C 0.24 0.27 350*C 0.29 0.28 340"C 0.33 0.21 335C 0.35
56 High Performance Thermoplastic Resins and Their Composites TABLE 17. Effect of Processing Cycle on Spherulite Size [l] Process Cycle Effect on Composite Effect on PEEK Morphology Mechanical Performance Quench Low percent crystallinity Tough, but lower matrix modulus equals reduced compression strength Slow cool to nonoptimum Large spherulites Decreased toughness crystallization temperature Fast cool to optimum Small spherulites Increased fracture crystallization tempera- toughness ture TABLE 18. Effect of Holding Temperature at Melting on the Degree of Crystallinity [173] holding temperature degree of crystallinity by WAXS by DSC 400-c 0.26 0.26 370-c 0.24 0.27 350-c 0.29 0.28 34O'C 0.33 0.21 335-c 0.35
Morphology 57 Neat Composite L 30 ● ◆- 20 )33d 10 definition in Table below 0 40 80 120 TOTAL HOLDING TIME min FIGURE 15.Crystallinity at 306C in 7 min versus Total Melt-annealing Time at 396C for Neat PEEK and Carbon Reinforced PEEK [110] Compression Molding Condition of PEEK and Carbon Reinforced PEEK Sample" Preheating Time° Cooling Rate Code (min) (°c/min) 30 -7 S 30 -0.6 LF 100 -7 LS 100 -0.6 .The first letter of sample code stands for preheating time:S(short)for 30 min and L (long)for 100 min.The second letter stands for cooling rate:F (fast)at-7C/min tolod by comp Cand2P for 30 min
Morphology 57 l- )- ) Neat Composite 0 40 80 I2 TOTAL HOLDING TIME ( min ) FIGURE 15. Crystallinity at 306°C in 7 min versus Total Melt-annealing Time at 396% for Neat PEEK and Carbon Reinforced PEEK [llO] Compression Molding Condition of PEEK and Carbon Reinforced PEEK Sample’ Preheating Timeb Cooling Rate Code (min) (OC/min) SF 30 -7 ss 30 -0.6 LF 100 -7 LS 100 -0.6 ‘The lirst letter 01 sample coda stands tar preheating time: S (short) Ior 30 min and L (long) lor 100 min. The second letter standr lor cooling rate: F (last) at -7“Cjmln and S (slow) at -0.6°C/min. b At 390% without pressure followed by compression molded at 390°C and 2 MPa lor 30 min