The evaluation process Editorial staff a rejected before in-depth review rejected after in-depth review Board of reviewing Editors published(biologi published(physical sci REJECT 30% 6% REJECT 20% 70 70%
The evaluation process Editorial staff Board of Reviewing Editors 20-30% REVIEW REJECT REJECT 70% ACCEPT (~10%) rejected before in-depth review rejected after in-depth review published (biological) published (physical sci) 70% 20% 6% 4%
Should your paper go to CNs? D Is it your best ever? n Will it have a big impact? o Does it interest scientists in other fields? o Does it overturn conventional wisdom? o Work that represents a large step forward solution to long-standing problem different way of thin king broad implications
Should your paper go to CNS? Is it your best ever? Will it have a big impact? Does it interest scientists in other fields? Does it overturn conventional wisdom? Work that represents a large step forward –solution to long-standing problem –different way of thinking –broad implications