风险分担实验 金梦珂1120329011 实验结果： 1.3组游戏结果如下： The Risk Pool Game File Play Reports Help Centralized Warehouse Rev:27580 C0GS:13790 0 12 Holding:10483.5 84 80 2 Profit:3306.5 公 2 Fill Rate:99% -Period 20 Supplier Warehouse Retailers Decentralized Retailers Rev:27740 36 2需 32 4 C0GS:13870 Holding:10840.5 28 16 27 Profit:3029.5 Fill Rate:100% /28 16 2 12 Start Round Supplier Retailers The Risk Pool Game File Play Reports Help Centralized Warehouse Rev:27580 2 C0GS:13790 ventory 0 1634 2 Holding:10483.5 80 29 25 Profit:3306.5 Fill Rate:99% -Period 20 Supplier Warehouse Retailers Decentralized Retailers Rev:27740 /36 /26 4 C0GS:13870 Holding:108405 m 23 Profit:3029.5 Fill Rate:100% Start Round Supplier Retailers
风险分担实验 金梦珂 1120329011 实验结果： 1. 3 组游戏结果如下：
The Risk Pool Game File Play Reports Help Centralized Warehouse Rev:28220 2 1. C0GS:14110 nventory 10 2 Holding:10558.5 38 91 2 Profit:3551.5 30 78☐ Fill Rate:97 -Period 20 Supplier Warehouse Retailers Decentralized Retailers Rev:28360 33 C0GS:14180 Holding:10947 5 38 27 20 34 Profit:3233 Fill Rate:98% 43 13 2 Start Round Supplier Retailers 实验结果表明：相比而言，集中型系统有较低的收入、工厂制造成本和持有，但有较高的了 利润，而分散型系统的服务水平略高于集中型系统。 2.实验结果如下（强烈正相关）： The Risk Pool Game File Play Reports Help Centralized Warehouse Rew:28220 4 2 1 C0GS:14110 0 3对 27 Holding:10681.5 51 27 5 Profit:3428.5 2 Fill Rate:982 -Period 20 Supplier Warehouse Retailers Decentralized Retailers Rev:28440 20 0 C0GS:14220 Holding:11047.5 5 5 Profit:3172.5 Fill Rate:98 17 9 3 Start Round Supplier Retailers
实验结果表明：相比而言，集中型系统有较低的收入、工厂制造成本和持有，但有较高的了 利润，而分散型系统的服务水平略高于集中型系统。 2. 实验结果如下（强烈正相关）：
The Risk Pool Game File Play Reports Help Centralized Warehouse Rev:28860 2 C0GS:14430 11 16 Holding:10518 44 84 15 8 两 Profit:3912 3 Fill Rate:97 Period- 20 Supplier Warehouse Retailers Decentralized Retailers Rev:29080 9 31 27 27 C0GS:14540 Holding:10866 2需 38 Profit:3674 Fill Rate:982 24 32 20 18 25 Start Round Supplier Retailers The Risk Pool Game File Play Reports Help Centralized Warehouse Rev:28700 3 C0GS:14350 5 310 28 Holding:10464 74 60 37 0 2 Profit:3886 40 20 Fill Rate:962 20 Supplier Warehouse Retailers Decentralized Retailers Rer:29000 2 23 g C0GS:14500 Holding:10812 24 21 46 27 Profit:3688 Fill Rate:97% 28 9 8 3 Start Round Supplier Retailers 实验结果如下（强烈负相关）：
实验结果如下（强烈负相关）：
The Risk Pool Game 口回X File Play Reports Help Centralized Warehouse Rev:29220 4 2 1 C0GS:14610 12 0 Holding:104925 65 24 5 Profit:4117.5 3 Fill Rate:992 20 Supplier Warehouse Retailers Decentralized Retailers Rev:28900 2 27 2 19 22 C0GS:14450 Holding:10860 24 13 Profit:3590 Fill Rate:98% 12 25 44 3 Start Round Supplier Retailers The Risk Pool Game File Play Reports Help Centralized Warehouse Rev:29500 4 C0G5:14750 0 14 23 23 Holding:10491 36 □ Profit:4259 35 6 Fill Rate:97 Period 20 Supplier Warehouse Retailers Decentralized Retailers Rev:29440 10 31 2时 2 31 C0GS:14720 Holding:10848 43 15 Profit:3872 Fill Rate:97 40 5 3 Start Round Supplier Retailers
The Risk Pool Game File Play Reports Help Centralized Warehouse Rev:28580 4 2 C0GS:14290 0 20 7 Holding:10489.5 「72 18 Profit:3800.5 2脑 □ Fill Rate:95% Period 20 Supplier Warehouse Retailers Decentralized Retailers Rev:28200 13 25 C0GS:14100 Holding:10872 7 20 Profit:3228 Fill Rate:94% 44 2 22 22 Start Round Supplier Retailers 实验结果表明：不管正相关还是负相关，集中型系统的盈利总是高于分散型系统，但是正相 关时，分散型系统的服务水平较高，而负相关时集中型系统的服务水平较高。 3.实验结果如下（标准差15)： The Risk Pool Game 口回☒ File Play Reports Help Centralized Warehouse Rev:30940 C0GS:15470 0 Holding:11163 67 26 9 Profit:4307 37 7 Fill Rate:94% Period 20 Supplier Warehouse Retailers Decentralized Retailers Rev:31280 39 20 7 30 28 C0GS:15640 Holding:12214.5 16 37 Profit:3425.5 Fill Rate:95% 4 3 Start Round Supplier Retailers
实验结果表明：不管正相关还是负相关，集中型系统的盈利总是高于分散型系统，但是正相 关时，分散型系统的服务水平较高，而负相关时集中型系统的服务水平较高。 3. 实验结果如下（标准差 15）：