Contributors T.Amand B.Couillaud Laboratoire de Physique de la Matiere Coherent,5100 Patrick Henry Drive, Condensee,INSA/CNRS, Santa Clara,CA 95054,USA Complexe Scientifique de Rangueil, F-31077 Toulouse Cedex 4,France A.Ducasse Centre de Physique Moleculaire V.Blanchet Optique et Hertzienne,Universite Laboratoire Collisions Agregats Reactivite Bordeaux I.351 cours de la Liberation. CNRS UMR 5589 F-33405 Talence Cedex,France Universite Paul Sabatier 118 Route de Narbonne B.Girard 31062 Toulouse Cedex,France Laboratoire Collisions Agregats Reactivite CNRS UMR 5589 A.Bonvalet Universite Paul Sabatier Laboratoire d'Optique et Biosciences(LOB)118 Route de Narbonne CNRS UMR 7645 INSERM U541-X- 31062 Toulouse Cedex,France ENSTA Ecole Polytechnique C.Hirlimann 91128 Palaiseau Cedex (France) Institut de Physique et Chimie des Materiaux de Strasbourg (IPCMS), E.Constant UMR7504 CNRS-ULP-ECPM, Centre Lasers Intenses at Applications 23 rue du Loess,BP 43 (CELIA) F-67034 Strasbourg Cedex2,France UMR 5107(Universite Bordeaux I-CNRS- ch@valholl.u-strasbg.fr CEA) 351 cours de la Liberation 33405 Talence Cedex,France
Contributors T. Amand Laboratoire de Physique de la Mati`ere Condens´ee, INSA/CNRS, Complexe Scientifique de Rangueil, F-31077 Toulouse Cedex 4, France V. Blanchet Laboratoire Collisions Agr´egats R´eactivit´e CNRS UMR 5589 Universit´e Paul Sabatier 118 Route de Narbonne 31062 Toulouse Cedex, France A. Bonvalet Laboratoire d’Optique et Biosciences (LOB) CNRS UMR 7645 – INSERM U541-XENSTA Ecole Polytechnique 91128 Palaiseau Cedex (France) E. Constant Centre Lasers Intenses at Applications (CELIA) UMR 5107 (Universit´e Bordeaux I-CNRSCEA) 351 cours de la Lib´eration 33405 Talence Cedex, France B. Couillaud Coherent, 5100 Patrick Henry Drive, Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA A. Ducasse Centre de Physique Mol´eculaire Optique et Hertzienne, Universit´e Bordeaux I, 351 cours de la Lib´eration, F-33405 Talence Cedex, France B. Girard Laboratoire Collisions Agr´egats R´eactivit´e CNRS UMR 5589 Universit´e Paul Sabatier 118 Route de Narbonne 31062 Toulouse Cedex, France C. Hirlimann Institut de Physique et Chimie des Mat´eriaux de Strasbourg (IPCMS), UMR7504 CNRS-ULP-ECPM, 23 rue du Loess, BP 43 F-67034 Strasbourg Cedex2, France ch@valholl.u-strasbg.fr
xvi Contributors M.Joffre C.Rulliere Laboratoire d'Optique et Biosciences(LOB)Centre de Physique Moleculaire CNRS UMR7645 -INSERM U541-X- Optique et Hertzienne (CPMOH) ENSTA UMR5798(CNRS-Universite Bordeaux I) Ecole Polytechnique 351 cours de la Liberation, 91128 Palaiseau Cedex(France) F-33405 Talence Cedex,France manuel.joffre@polytechnique.fr rulliere@cribx1.u-bordeaux.fr and X.Marie Commissariat al'Energie Atomique(CEA) Laboratoire de Physique de la CESTA BPNo2 Matiere Condensee,INSA/CNRS, 33114-Le Barp (FRANCE) Complexe Scientifique de Rangueil claude.rulliere@cea.fr F-31077 Toulouse Cedex 4,France F.Salin E.Mevel Centre Lasers Intenses et Applications Centre Lasers Intenses at Applications (CELIA) (CELIA) UMR 5107(Universite Bordeaux I-CNRS- UMR 5107(Universite Bordeaux I-CNRS- CEA) CEA) 351 cours de la Liberation 351 cours de la Liberation 33405 Talence Cedex.France 33405 Talence Cedex,France salinacelia.u-bordeaux.fr J.Oberle L.Sarger Centre de Physique Moleculaire Centre de Physique Moleculaire Optique et Hertzienne (CPMOH), Optique et Hertzienne (CPMOH), UMR5798(CNRS-Universite Bordeaux I) UMR5798(CNRS-Universite Bordeaux I) 351 Cours de la Liberation, 351 Cours de la Liberation, F-33405 Talence,France F-33405 Talence,France oberle@cpmoh.u-bordeaux.fr sargeracpmoh.u-bordeaux.fr
xvi Contributors M. Joffre Laboratoire d’Optique et Biosciences (LOB) CNRS UMR7645 – INSERM U541-XENSTA Ecole Polytechnique 91128 Palaiseau Cedex (France) manuel.joffre@polytechnique.fr X. Marie Laboratoire de Physique de la Mati`ere Condens´ee, INSA/CNRS, Complexe Scientifique de Rangueil F-31077 Toulouse Cedex 4, France E. M´evel Centre Lasers Intenses at Applications (CELIA) UMR 5107 (Universit´e Bordeaux I-CNRSCEA) 351 cours de la Lib´eration 33405 Talence Cedex, France J. Oberl´e Centre de Physique Mol´eculaire Optique et Hertzienne (CPMOH), UMR5798 (CNRS-Universit´e Bordeaux I) 351 Cours de la Lib´eration, F-33405 Talence, France oberle@cpmoh.u-bordeaux.fr C. Rulli`ere Centre de Physique Mol´eculaire Optique et Hertzienne (CPMOH) UMR5798 (CNRS-Universit´e Bordeaux I) 351 cours de la Lib´eration, F-33405 Talence Cedex, France rulliere@cribx1.u-bordeaux.fr and Commissariat ´a l’Energie Atomique (CEA) CESTA BPNo2 33114-Le Barp (FRANCE) claude.rulliere@cea.fr F. Salin Centre Lasers Intenses et Applications (CELIA) UMR 5107 (Universit´e Bordeaux I-CNRSCEA) 351 cours de la Lib´eration 33405 Talence Cedex, France salin@celia.u-bordeaux.fr L. Sarger Centre de Physique Mol´eculaire Optique et Hertzienne (CPMOH), UMR5798 (CNRS-Universit´e Bordeaux I) 351 Cours de la Lib´eration, F-33405 Talence, France sarger@cpmoh.u-bordeaux.fr
1 Laser Basics C.Hirlimann With 18 Figures 1.1 Introduction Lasers are the basic building block of the technologies for the generation of short light pulses.Only two decades after the laser had been invented, the duration of the shortest produced pulse had shrunk down six orders of magnitude,going from the nanosecond regime to the femtosecond regime. "Light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation"is the misleading meaning of the word "laser".The real instrument is not only an amplifier but also a resonant optical cavity implementing a positive feedback between the emitted light and the amplifying medium.A laser also needs to be fed with energy of some sort. 1.2 Stimulated Emission Max Planck,in 1900,found a theoretical derivation for the experimentally observed frequency distribution of black-body radiation.In a very simplified view,a black body is the thermal equilibrium between matter and light at a given temperature.For this purpose Planck had to divide the phase space associated with the black body into small,finite volumes.Quanta were born. The distribution law he found can be written as hw3 dw I(w)d =72(ehTKT-1)' (1.1) where I(w)stands for the intensity of the angular frequency distribution in the small interval dw,h=h/2m,h is a constant factor which was later named after Planck,k is Boltzmann's constant,T is the equilibrium temperature and c the velocity of light in vacuum.Planck first considered his findings as a heretical mathematical trick giving the right answer;it took him sometime to realize that quantization has a physical meaning
1 Laser Basics C. Hirlimann With 18 Figures 1.1 Introduction Lasers are the basic building block of the technologies for the generation of short light pulses. Only two decades after the laser had been invented, the duration of the shortest produced pulse had shrunk down six orders of magnitude, going from the nanosecond regime to the femtosecond regime. “Light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation” is the misleading meaning of the word “laser”. The real instrument is not only an amplifier but also a resonant optical cavity implementing a positive feedback between the emitted light and the amplifying medium. A laser also needs to be fed with energy of some sort. 1.2 Stimulated Emission Max Planck, in 1900, found a theoretical derivation for the experimentally observed frequency distribution of black-body radiation. In a very simplified view, a black body is the thermal equilibrium between matter and light at a given temperature. For this purpose Planck had to divide the phase space associated with the black body into small, finite volumes. Quanta were born. The distribution law he found can be written as I(ω) dω = ¯hω3 dω π2c2(ehω/kT ¯ − 1), (1.1) where I(ω) stands for the intensity of the angular frequency distribution in the small interval dω, ¯h = h/2π, h is a constant factor which was later named after Planck, k is Boltzmann’s constant, T is the equilibrium temperature and c the velocity of light in vacuum. Planck first considered his findings as a heretical mathematical trick giving the right answer; it took him sometime to realize that quantization has a physical meaning
2 C.Hirlimann En Nn Bmn Anm Bnm =En-Em Em Nm Fig.1.1.Energy diagram of an atomic two-level system.Energies Em and En are measured with reference to some lowest level In 1905,Albert Einstein,though,had to postulate the quantization of elec- tromagnetic energy in order to give the first interpretation of the photo-electric effect.This step had him wondering for a long time about the compatibility of this quantization and Planck's black-body theory.Things started to clarify in 1913 when Bohr published his atomic model,in which electrons are con- strained to stay on fixed energy levels and may exchange only energy quanta with the outside world.Let us consider(see Figure 1.1)two electronic levels n and m in an atom,with energies Em and En referenced to some fundamental level;one quantum of light,called a photon,with energy hw =En-Em,is absorbed with a probability Bin and its energy is transferred to an electron jumping from level m to level n.There is a probability Anm that an electron on level n steps down to level m,emitting a photon with the same energy. This spontaneous light emission is analogous to the general spontaneous en- ergy decay found in classical mechanical systems.In the year 1917,ending his thinking on black-body radiation,Einstein came out with the postulate that,for an excited state,there should be another de-excitation channel with probability Bnm:the“induced”or“stimulated”emission.This new emission process only occurs when an electromagnetic field hw is present in the vicinity of the atom and it is proportional to the intensity of the field.The quantities Anm,Bnm,Bmn are called Einstein's coefficients. Let us now consider a set of N atoms,of which Nm are in state m and Nn in state n,and assume that this set is illuminated with a light wave of angular frequency w such that hw En-Em,with intensity I(w).At a given temperature T,in a steady-state regime,the number of absorbed photons equals the number of emitted photons (equilibrium situation of a black body).The number of absorbed photons per unit time is proportional to the transition probability Bmn for an electron to jump from state m to state n,to the incident intensity I(w)and to the number of atoms in the set Nm.A simple inversion of the role played by the indices m and n gives the number of electrons per unit time relaxing from state n to state m by emitting a photon under the influence of the electromagnetic field.The last contribution to the interaction,spontaneous emission,does not depend on the intensity but only
2 C. Hirlimann Fig. 1.1. Energy diagram of an atomic two-level system. Energies Em and En are measured with reference to some lowest level In 1905, Albert Einstein, though, had to postulate the quantization of electromagnetic energy in order to give the first interpretation of the photo-electric effect. This step had him wondering for a long time about the compatibility of this quantization and Planck’s black-body theory. Things started to clarify in 1913 when Bohr published his atomic model, in which electrons are constrained to stay on fixed energy levels and may exchange only energy quanta with the outside world. Let us consider (see Figure 1.1) two electronic levels n and m in an atom, with energies Em and En referenced to some fundamental level; one quantum of light, called a photon, with energy ¯hω = En − Em, is absorbed with a probability Bmn and its energy is transferred to an electron jumping from level m to level n. There is a probability Anm that an electron on level n steps down to level m, emitting a photon with the same energy. This spontaneous light emission is analogous to the general spontaneous energy decay found in classical mechanical systems. In the year 1917, ending his thinking on black-body radiation, Einstein came out with the postulate that, for an excited state, there should be another de-excitation channel with probability Bnm: the “induced” or “stimulated” emission. This new emission process only occurs when an electromagnetic field ¯hω is present in the vicinity of the atom and it is proportional to the intensity of the field. The quantities Anm, Bnm, Bmn are called Einstein’s coefficients. Let us now consider a set of N atoms, of which Nm are in state m and Nn in state n, and assume that this set is illuminated with a light wave of angular frequency ω such that ¯hω = En − Em, with intensity I(ω). At a given temperature T, in a steady-state regime, the number of absorbed photons equals the number of emitted photons (equilibrium situation of a black body). The number of absorbed photons per unit time is proportional to the transition probability Bmn for an electron to jump from state m to state n, to the incident intensity I(ω) and to the number of atoms in the set Nm. A simple inversion of the role played by the indices m and n gives the number of electrons per unit time relaxing from state n to state m by emitting a photon under the influence of the electromagnetic field. The last contribution to the interaction, spontaneous emission, does not depend on the intensity but only
1 Laser Basics 3 on the number of electrons in state n and on the transition probability Amn. This can be simply formalized in a simple energy conservation equation NmBmnI(w)=Nn BnmI(w)+NnAnm. (1.2) Boltzmann's law,deduced from the statistical analysis of gases,gives the relative populations on two levels separated by an energy hw at temperature T,Nn/Nm exp(-hw/kT).When applied to (1.2)one gets BmnI(w)eh/T=Anm+BnmI(w) (1.3) and Anm I()-Bin chTkT-Bnm (1.4) This black-body frequency distribution function is exactly equivalent to Planck's distribution (1.1).At this point it is important to notice that Ein- stein wouldn't have succeeded without introducing the stimulated emission. Comparison of expressions(1.1)and (1.4)shows that Bmn =Bnm:for a pho- ton the probability to be absorbed equals the probability to be emitted by stimulation.These two effects are perfectly symmetrical;they both take place when an electromagnetic field is present around an atom. Strangely enough,by giving a physical interpretation to Planck's law based on photons interacting with an energy-quantized matter,Einstein has made the spontaneous emission appear mysterious.Why is an excited atom not stable?If light is not the cause of the spontaneous emission,then what is the hidden cause?This point still gives rise to a passionate debate today about the role played by the fluctuations of the field present in the vacuum.Comparison of expressions (1.1)and (1.4)also leads to Anm/Bnm =hw3/n2c2,so that when the light absorption probability is known then the spontaneous and stimulated emission probabilities are also known. According to Einstein's theory,three different processes can take place during the interaction of light with matter,as described below. 1.2.1 Absorption In this process one photon from the radiation field disappears and the energy is transferred to an electron as potential energy when it changes state from Em to En.The probability for an electron to undergo the absorption transition is Bmn· 1.2.2 Spontaneous Emission When being in an excited state En,an electron in an atom has a probability Anm to spontaneously fall to the lower state Em.The loss of potential energy gives rise to the simultaneous emission of a photon with energy hw=En-Em The direction,phase and polarization of the photon are random quantities
1 Laser Basics 3 on the number of electrons in state n and on the transition probability Amn. This can be simply formalized in a simple energy conservation equation NmBmnI(ω) = NnBnmI(ω) + NnAnm. (1.2) Boltzmann’s law, deduced from the statistical analysis of gases, gives the relative populations on two levels separated by an energy ¯hω at temperature T, Nn/Nm = exp(−hω/kT ¯ ). When applied to (1.2) one gets BmnI(ω) ehω/kT ¯ = Anm + BnmI(ω) (1.3) and I(ω) = Anm Bmn ehω/kT ¯ − Bnm . (1.4) This black-body frequency distribution function is exactly equivalent to Planck’s distribution (1.1). At this point it is important to notice that Einstein wouldn’t have succeeded without introducing the stimulated emission. Comparison of expressions (1.1) and (1.4) shows that Bmn = Bnm: for a photon the probability to be absorbed equals the probability to be emitted by stimulation. These two effects are perfectly symmetrical; they both take place when an electromagnetic field is present around an atom. Strangely enough, by giving a physical interpretation to Planck’s law based on photons interacting with an energy-quantized matter, Einstein has made the spontaneous emission appear mysterious. Why is an excited atom not stable? If light is not the cause of the spontaneous emission, then what is the hidden cause? This point still gives rise to a passionate debate today about the role played by the fluctuations of the field present in the vacuum. Comparison of expressions (1.1) and (1.4) also leads to Anm/Bnm = ¯hω3/π2c2, so that when the light absorption probability is known then the spontaneous and stimulated emission probabilities are also known. According to Einstein’s theory, three different processes can take place during the interaction of light with matter, as described below. 1.2.1 Absorption In this process one photon from the radiation field disappears and the energy is transferred to an electron as potential energy when it changes state from Em to En. The probability for an electron to undergo the absorption transition is Bmn. 1.2.2 Spontaneous Emission When being in an excited state En, an electron in an atom has a probability Anm to spontaneously fall to the lower state Em. The loss of potential energy gives rise to the simultaneous emission of a photon with energy ¯hω = En−Em. The direction, phase and polarization of the photon are random quantities