Let's work together! long involved sentences 1. They will also find amoko many American political leaders a deep concern over the balance of power in Europe,a balance that would be destroyed-to America's disadvo tage-if the Germans were able to defeat the French and the British anareby emerge as the sole major power in Europe.(para.8) The prepositional subject phrase is an adverbial predicate verb object modifying the predicate verb. The second part elaborates the object"balance"by: 1.Repeating the key word "balance" 2.a restrictive relative clause"that would be destroyed"defines the word 3.a prepositional phrase "to America's disadvantage"indicates the consequence of the action of the balance being destroyed 4. an if-clause indicates the conditions under which the balance would be destroyed
Unit 1 long involved sentences 1. They will also find among many American political leaders a deep concern over the balance of power in Europe, a balance that would be destroyed - to America’s disadvantage - if the Germans were able to defeat the French and the British and thereby emerge as the sole major power in Europe. (para. 8) The second part elaborates the object “balance” by: 1. Repeating the key word “balance” 2. a restrictive relative clause “that would be destroyed” defines the word 3. a prepositional phrase “to America’s disadvantage” indicates the consequence of the action of the balance being destroyed 4. an if-clause indicates the conditions under which the balance would be destroyed Let’s work together! The prepositional phrase is an adverbial modifying the predicate verb. subject predicate verb object
Let's work together! long involved sentences 2.If the state of our knowledge were such that it provided us with a model of unquestioned validity that com letely explained human behavior,we dan.(para.13) Subject of subordinate clause Predicate verb Adverbial clause of result Relative clause modifying "such" modifying "validity" This is a complex sentence in which the main clause "we can"is very short and simple,whereas the subordinate clause is a bit complex
Unit 1 This is a complex sentence in which the main clause “we can” is very short and simple, whereas the subordinate clause is a bit complex. long involved sentences 2. If the state of our knowledge were such that it provided us with a model of unquestioned validity that completely explained human behavior, we can. (para. 13) Let’s work together! Adverbial clause of result modifying “such” Subject of subordinate clause Predicate verb predicative Relative clause modifying “validity
Sentence Paraphrase 1 Most students are usually introduced to the study of history by way of a fat textbook and become quickly immersed in a vast sea of names,dates,events and statistics.(1) thick (metaphor)a great number of Most students usually come to have their first experience of the study of history through the reading of a thick history textbook and soon are overwhelmed by a large number of names,dates,events and statistics
Unit 1 thick (metaphor) a great number of Sentence Paraphrase 1 Most students are usually introduced to the study of history by way of a fat textbook and become quickly immersed in a vast sea of names, dates, events and statistics. (1) Most students usually come to have their first experience of the study of history through the reading of a thick history textbook and soon are overwhelmed by a large number of names, dates, events and statistics
Sentence Paraphrase 2 2.Their commonsense reaction to this state of affairs is to conclude that one historian is right while the other is wrong.(2) their response based on common sense "whereas"or "and" implying a contrast When a person is faced with this kind of situation,the normal, practical response will be that one historian is right whereas the other is wrong
Unit 1 their response based on common sense “whereas” or “and”, implying a contrast Sentence Paraphrase 2 2. Their commonsense reaction to this state of affairs is to conclude that one historian is right while the other is wrong. (2) When a person is faced with this kind of situation, the normal, practical response will be that one historian is right whereas the other is wrong