Final exam Very good performance overall Essays were particularly good Mean -88.5 Standard deviation -570o mit 人 16881
Final Exam • Very good performance overall • Essays were particularly good • Mean - 88.5% • Standard deviation - 5.7% 16.881 MIT
Homework HW#8 - Mean = 96.1 Standard deviation =7.4 HW#9 Mean =94.9 Standard deviation =5.5 mit 人 16881
Homework • HW#8 – Mean = 96.1 – Standard Deviation = 7.4 • HW#9 – Mean = 94.9 – Standard Deviation = 5.5 16.881 MIT
The remainder of the course Primary mission - Complete your term projects Secondary mission --Cover topics of interest 70% of your grades are set(term project=30%) Class sessions(half new topics /half consultation) Tolerance Design/Projects Mahalanobis taguchi system /Projects Conceptual robust Design /Projects Final project presentations mit 人 16881
The Remainder of the Course • Primary mission -- Complete your term projects • Secondary mission -- Cover topics of interest • 70% of your grades are set (term project = 30%) • Class sessions (half new topics / half consultation) – Tolerance Design / Projects – Mahalanobis Taguchi System / Projects – Conceptual Robust Design / Projects – Final Project Presentations 16.881 MIT
Expectations on Final Project Should represent 30 hours of effort Options Full robust design effort Planning phase only Post mortem analysis of a previous effort Study of an advanced topic in robust design Other possibilities with permission mit 人 16881
Expectations on Final Project • Should represent ~30 hours of effort • Options – Full robust design effort – Planning phase only – Post mortem analysis of a previous effort – Study of an advanced topic in robust design – Other possibilities with permission 16.881 MIT
Grading of the Final project °75% Written report 25% Oral presentation Grading criteria include Impact and significance of the results Quality of the planning and analysis Clarity of technical exposition mit 人 16881
Grading of the Final Project • 75% Written report • 25% Oral presentation • Grading criteria include – Impact and significance of the results – Quality of the planning and analysis – Clarity of technical exposition 16.881 MIT