Availableonlineatwww.sciencedirect.co °" Science Direct COMPOSITE STRUCTURES ELSEVIER Composite Structures 78(2007)477-485 ww.elsevier. com/locate/compstruct Mechanical property degradation of a Nicalon fiber reinforced SiNC ceramic matrix composite under thermal shock loading Sirajus Salekeen, Justice Nana Amoako, Hassan Mahfuz, Shaik Jeelani Center for Adranced Materials, Tuskegee Unicersity, Tuskegee, AL 36088, United States Available online 27 December 2005 Abstract The degradation of mechanical properties of a Sic fiber reinforced SiNC ceramic matrix composite due to thermal shock by water quenching have been investigated. Post thermal shock tensile tests were performed to determine the degradation of mechanical properties of this composite In situ acoustic emission(AE) tests were also conducted. The tensile tests data and acoustic emission data were cor- elated. The AE signal indicated a sudden increase in aE events at critical points in the stress-strain relationship. The effects of thermal shock temperature and the number of thermal shock cycles on the mechanical properties, and on the ae responses were also evaluated. It observed that an increase in either factor resulted in more AE responses. fracture damage in the tensile test specimens was examined by Scanning Electron Microscopy. It was observed that the failure mechanism changed as the thermal shock temperature increased. The fracture surfaces of the specimens tested without thermal shock indicated an extensive fiber pullout while the thermally shocked speci mens showed reduced fiber pullout o 2005 Published by Elsevier Ltd Keywords: Ceramic matrix composites; Thermal shock; Acoustic emission 1. Introduction ven by the still spinning rotor passes through the hot sec- tion. The rapid cooling of the hot sections leads to severe In the process of developing more efficient industrial gas thermal shock. Since a typical gas turbine undergoes sev- turbines and turbine engines for airplanes to travel at eral emergency shut downs over its lifetime, ceramic com- supersonic speeds(High Speed Civil Transport, HSCT), ponents of the turbine and turbine engine may suffer let(turbine inlet)temperature. This has created the need to radation as a result of thermal shocks. Thermal shocks develop new materials that can withstand very high therefore, possess potential risk since cracks generally lead temperatures, and of the new materials, fiber-reinforced to the end of the service life for these components. Compo- ceramic matrIx compos AC)have attracted consider- nents made of CMCs are also used at the end section of hot able attention for use in industrial gas turbines and turbine exhaust nozzles and are often exposed to rain. After con- engines for the HSCT. idering these facts, it was decided in the current investiga While thermal shock is not a concern during a steady- tion to determine the effect of thermal shock on SiC/siNC state operation of gas turbines, it becomes important dur- composites subjected to a water-quenching technique. A ing emergency shut downs during which the temperature quench test exposes the materials to a more severe thermal of the inlet air drops abruptly by orders of magnitude In shock than they experience in service this case, the fuel supply is abruptly cut off and cool air dri- Extensive investigation on the behavior of CMC materi- als when subjected to abrupt thermal gradients has not yet been performed, as noted in a recent review by Wang and E-mail address: salekeens(@tuskegee. edu(S. Salekeen Singh [1]. Hasselman [2] expressed that the understanding 0263-8223/S.see front matter 2005 Published by Elsevier Ltd. doi: 10. 1016/j. compstruct 2005.11.016
Mechanical property degradation of a Nicalon fiber reinforced SiNC ceramic matrix composite under thermal shock loading Sirajus Salekeen *, Justice Nana Amoako, Hassan Mahfuz, Shaik Jeelani Center for Advanced Materials, Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, AL 36088, United States Available online 27 December 2005 Abstract The degradation of mechanical properties of a SiC fiber reinforced SiNC ceramic matrix composite due to thermal shock by water quenching have been investigated. Post thermal shock tensile tests were performed to determine the degradation of mechanical properties of this composite. In situ acoustic emission (AE) tests were also conducted. The tensile tests data and acoustic emission data were correlated. The AE signal indicated a sudden increase in AE events at critical points in the stress–strain relationship. The effects of thermal shock temperature and the number of thermal shock cycles on the mechanical properties, and on the AE responses were also evaluated. It was observed that an increase in either factor resulted in more AE responses. Fracture damage in the tensile test specimens was examined by Scanning Electron Microscopy. It was observed that the failure mechanism changed as the thermal shock temperature increased. The fracture surfaces of the specimens tested without thermal shock indicated an extensive fiber pullout while the thermally shocked specimens showed reduced fiber pullout. 2005 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Keywords: Ceramic matrix composites; Thermal shock; Acoustic emission 1. Introduction In the process of developing more efficient industrial gas turbines and turbine engines for airplanes to travel at supersonic speeds (High Speed Civil Transport, HSCT), much effort has been directed at raising the combustor outlet (turbine inlet) temperature. This has created the need to develop new materials that can withstand very high temperatures, and of the new materials, fiber-reinforced ceramic matrix composites (CMC) have attracted considerable attention for use in industrial gas turbines and turbine engines for the HSCT. While thermal shock is not a concern during a steadystate operation of gas turbines, it becomes important during emergency shut downs during which the temperature of the inlet air drops abruptly by orders of magnitude. In this case, the fuel supply is abruptly cut off and cool air driven by the still spinning rotor passes through the hot section. The rapid cooling of the hot sections leads to severe thermal shock. Since a typical gas turbine undergoes several emergency shut downs over its lifetime, ceramic components of the turbine and turbine engine may suffer from the formation of cracks and associated strength degradation as a result of thermal shocks. Thermal shocks, therefore, possess potential risk since cracks generally lead to the end of the service life for these components. Components made of CMCs are also used at the end section of hot exhaust nozzles and are often exposed to rain. After considering these facts, it was decided in the current investigation to determine the effect of thermal shock on SiC/SiNC composites subjected to a water-quenching technique. A quench test exposes the materials to a more severe thermal shock than they experience in service. Extensive investigation on the behavior of CMC materials when subjected to abrupt thermal gradients has not yet been performed, as noted in a recent review by Wang and Singh [1]. Hasselman [2] expressed that the understanding 0263-8223/$ - see front matter 2005 Published by Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.11.016 * Corresponding author. E-mail address: salekeens@tuskegee.edu (S. Salekeen). www.elsevier.com/locate/compstruct Composite Structures 78 (2007) 477–485
S. Salekeen et al /Composite Structures 78(2007)477-485 of the thermal shock behavior lies in the correlation between retained strength and initiation of cracks under thermal stress. In a few published studies [3,4, 10] on this ubject, flexural strength tests were mainly conducted to R297 assess the thermal shock induced damage. Although flex 48.6 ural test are easy to perform, the results generally do not reflect randomly occurring defects in highly stressed part y1.3 4, 5]. During a bend test, only a small volume of the test piece material experiences the maximum load, making the strength measurements primarily dependent upon defects all dimensions are in mm ear the surface. Also, flexural testing may not adequately Fig. 1. Tensile specimen geometry quantify damage because of the combination of tensile, compressive and shear stresses involved. However, in a ten to uniform stress. The larger volume of fully loaded mate- ature. The composite is then pyrola sang at a low temper- sile test the entire gage length of the specimen is subjected lay-up, and it is then cured by process convert the prece rial in a tensile specimen relative to a flexural specimen ramic polymer into a ceramic. Subsequent impregnation increases the probability of finding a large flaw. Consider- and pyrolysis steps are carried out to achieve a final density ing these facts it was decided to use the tensile test as a post of 2.55 g/em. The volume fraction of fiber is 50% and the thermal shock destructive evaluation technique in this average diameter is approximately 14 um. Edge-loaded Investigation specimens having a geometry as shown in Fig. I were used Most studies of thermal shock on Nicalon fiber rein- for this investigation, eliminating the requirement of forced CMCs have been based on destructive techniques mounting external tabbing materials. The reduction in only [6-9]. Wang and Singh [10] are among the few who cross section from the grips to the specimen gage section have performed both destructive and nondestructive tech- was achieved by utilizing a single blend radius of niques to evaluate the thermal shock behavior of Nicalon 297 mm. The maximum specimen width at the specimen fiber reinforced silicon carbide ceramic composites. Their ends is 14 mm. a gage section width of 6.3 mm is used. choices for destructive and nondestructive evaluation the specimen thickness is 2.5 mm, and the overall specimen methods for this composite were the flexural test and length is 148.6 mm. mechanical-forced resonance methods, respectively. In the present investigation, in addition to post thermal tensile 2. 2. Thermal shock behavior testing a nondestructive evaluation (NDE) technique, in this case, the acoustic emission is simultaneously employed The thermal shock tests involved heating the test sam- The acoustic emissions occur when the elastic energy accu- ples in a furnace to an elevated temperature in air and then dynamic microstructural processes such as crack initiation ture. The g(shocking)them into water at room tempera- mulated within a stressed body is released due to different immersir and propagation. Available literature dealing with ae for 20 min to ensure sufficient thermal equilibrium. The analysis over a time domain can be found in a few publica- elapsed time for removing the specimen from furnace and tions [11-13]. Efforts were made in this investigation to cor- immersing it into water is about 3 s. The specimens were relate different fracture processes with the corresponding then kept in a water bath for 5 min. Each heating and AE responses. Finally, a Scanning Electron Microscopic shocking process together constituted one thermal shock (SEM)evaluation of the fracture surfaces was performed cycle. After each thermal shock cycle, the samples were as part of this study dried in an oven at 100C for 20 min. They were inspected visually for the appearance of any macroscopic damage 2. Experimental procedure such as delamination and chipping. Then destructive and nondestructive tests were carried out on all the specimens 2. Material and geometry The mass and dimensions of the specimens were measured with a precision of 0.0001 g and 0.01 mm, respectively. An The material used in this investigation is a ceramic Instron 8502 servohydraulic machine equipped with a self- matrix composite(CMC) comprised of a two-dimensional aligning super grip was used to perform the post thermal eight-harness satin woven SiC fabric impregnated by a sil- tensile test with a crosshead speed of 0.02 mm/s. aE instru- icon nitrogen carbon (SINC) matrix. The fiber is basically mentation from Physical Acoustics Corporation(PAC) B-SiC crystallites and the matrix is an amorphous mixture was used to monitor acoustic emissions. AE events such of silicon, carbon and nitrogen. These composite specimens as energy and counts were recorded simultaneously in real were supplied by Dow Corning Corporation(Midland, time during the mechanical testing. The AE instrumenta Michigan)and were manufactured by a polymer impregna- tion included a piezoelectric transducer(sensor), a pream- tion and pyrolysis(PIP)process. The matrix precursor is plifier (model 1220 A)with an option on a main first impregnated into the eight-harness satin woven fabric control of 40 dB or 60 dB
of the thermal shock behavior lies in the correlation between retained strength and initiation of cracks under thermal stress. In a few published studies [3,4,10] on this subject, flexural strength tests were mainly conducted to assess the thermal shock induced damage. Although flexural test are easy to perform, the results generally do not reflect randomly occurring defects in highly stressed parts [4,5]. During a bend test, only a small volume of the test piece material experiences the maximum load, making the strength measurements primarily dependent upon defects near the surface. Also, flexural testing may not adequately quantify damage because of the combination of tensile, compressive and shear stresses involved. However, in a tensile test the entire gage length of the specimen is subjected to uniform stress. The larger volume of fully loaded material in a tensile specimen relative to a flexural specimen increases the probability of finding a large flaw. Considering these facts it was decided to use the tensile test as a post thermal shock destructive evaluation technique in this investigation. Most studies of thermal shock on Nicalon fiber reinforced CMCs have been based on destructive techniques only [6–9]. Wang and Singh [10] are among the few who have performed both destructive and nondestructive techniques to evaluate the thermal shock behavior of Nicalon fiber reinforced silicon carbide ceramic composites. Their choices for destructive and nondestructive evaluation methods for this composite were the flexural test and mechanical-forced resonance methods, respectively. In the present investigation, in addition to post thermal tensile testing a nondestructive evaluation (NDE) technique, in this case, the acoustic emission is simultaneously employed. The acoustic emissions occur when the elastic energy accumulated within a stressed body is released due to different dynamic microstructural processes such as crack initiation and propagation. Available literature dealing with AE analysis over a time domain can be found in a few publications [11–13]. Efforts were made in this investigation to correlate different fracture processes with the corresponding AE responses. Finally, a Scanning Electron Microscopic (SEM) evaluation of the fracture surfaces was performed as part of this study. 2. Experimental procedure 2.1. Material and geometry The material used in this investigation is a ceramic matrix composite (CMC) comprised of a two-dimensional eight-harness satin woven SiC fabric impregnated by a silicon nitrogen carbon (SiNC) matrix. The fiber is basically b-SiC crystallites and the matrix is an amorphous mixture of silicon, carbon and nitrogen. These composite specimens were supplied by Dow Corning Corporation (Midland, Michigan) and were manufactured by a polymer impregnation and pyrolysis (PIP) process. The matrix precursor is first impregnated into the eight-harness satin woven fabric lay-up, and it is then cured by processing at a low temperature. The composite is then pyrolized to convert the preceramic polymer into a ceramic. Subsequent impregnation and pyrolysis steps are carried out to achieve a final density of 2.55 g/cm3 . The volume fraction of fiber is 50% and the average diameter is approximately 14 lm. Edge-loaded specimens having a geometry as shown in Fig. 1 were used for this investigation, eliminating the requirement of mounting external tabbing materials. The reduction in cross section from the grips to the specimen gage section was achieved by utilizing a single blend radius of 297 mm. The maximum specimen width at the specimen ends is 14 mm. A gage section width of 6.3 mm is used, the specimen thickness is 2.5 mm, and the overall specimen length is 148.6 mm. 2.2. Thermal shock behavior The thermal shock tests involved heating the test samples in a furnace to an elevated temperature in air and then immersing (shocking) them into water at room temperature. The specimens were held at the elevated temperature for 20 min to ensure sufficient thermal equilibrium. The elapsed time for removing the specimen from furnace and immersing it into water is about 3 s. The specimens were then kept in a water bath for 5 min. Each heating and shocking process together constituted one thermal shock cycle. After each thermal shock cycle, the samples were dried in an oven at 100 C for 20 min. They were inspected visually for the appearance of any macroscopic damage such as delamination and chipping. Then destructive and nondestructive tests were carried out on all the specimens. The mass and dimensions of the specimens were measured with a precision of 0.0001 g and 0.01 mm, respectively. An Instron 8502 servohydraulic machine equipped with a selfaligning super grip was used to perform the post thermal tensile test with a crosshead speed of 0.02 mm/s. AE instrumentation from Physical Acoustics Corporation (PAC) was used to monitor acoustic emissions. AE events such as energy and counts were recorded simultaneously in real time during the mechanical testing. The AE instrumentation included a piezoelectric transducer (sensor), a preamplifier (model 1220 A) with an option on a main gain control of 40 dB or 60 dB. 2.5 All dimensions are in mm 148.6 7.0 1.3 6.3 52.3 R 297 8° Fig. 1. Tensile specimen geometry. 478 S. Salekeen et al. / Composite Structures 78 (2007) 477–485
S. Salekeen et aL. Composite Structures 78(2007)477-485 3. Results and discussion 3.I. Thermal shock behavior The degradation of strength due to thermal shock was determined by measuring the retained strength after ther 苏品 mally quencing the specimens from different elevated tem- peratures to room temperature in water. These elevated temperatures are400°C,600°Cand800°C. Experiments were also performed on unshocked specimens at room tem- Fig 3. The effect of shock temperature difference on strength of the SiC/ perature(RT). The stress-strain behaviors of both unshoc- SINC composite ked specimens, and specimens shocked from various elevated temperatures are shown in Fig. 2. From Fig. 2 it is clear that the mechanical properties of damage occurs is called the critical temperature differen nt ference in temperature(An) below which no significa the thermally shocked samples are lower than those of the (AT ). The critical temperature of a material, therefore, unshocked samples. Properties such as ultimate strength, a design parameter that signifies the limitation of working eld strength, and elastic modulus all degraded due to temperature for that material Fig. 3 shows that the first significant drop of material stress-strain behavior of the composites under all testing strength occurs at about 350 C. Thus, the critical thermal conditions consists of two fundamental regions: the initial shock temperature difference of this material can be tenta- linear region and the final nonlinear region. In the linear tively assumed to be 350C. It is also noticeable that there fibers and matrix. In the nonlinear region, which sustains is a gradual decrease in strength beyond this critical tem- perature difference(ATc). Much literatures is available that more strain than the linear region, the load is gradually deals with effect of thermal shock on the mechanical prop- transferred from the matrix to the fibers. The nonlinear erties of materials. A typical property degradation curve region also indicates a larger damage tolerance as a result due to thermal shock on CMC [10 is shown in Fig.4 f fibers bridging the cracks. The transition point from Fig 4 shows that the onset of damage in CMC occurs at the linear to the nonlinear region signifies the initiation a critical temperature difference ATe. The damage pro- of significant matrix cracks. After the matrix cracks, fibers gresses as AT increases and then eventually saturates at act to bridge the matrix cracks and enhance the toughness even some higher AT. It is understood that the beginning thermal shock was measured in order to determine the crit- or both. When the m e. of the material. These cracks, however, permit the harsh of the gradual decrea mechanical pi roberge was environments to move easily into the composite, degrading brought about by matrix cracking or debonding or both the fiber /matrix interface as well as the fiber strength The ultimate retained strength of each specimen after at AT. The nonsteady state represents the continuation and enlargement state for matrix cracking or debonding ical temperature difference (ATc). The effect of thermal the second steady state indicates that the reinforcing fibers shock temperature difference(AT) on the retained strength bridge the cracks, which limits the thermal shock damage of this composite is shown in Fig 3. The shocking temper- From there on the strength of the composite is determined ature difference(AT), in this case, refers to the difference in largely by the load carrying capability of the fibers and is temperature between the furnace and the room tempera- usually not affected by the thermal shock damage The thermal shock degradation behavior is best charac- maximum difference in temperature (An) that a ceramic terized by the normalized retained strength of the material material can sustain without cracking. This maximum dif- which is defined as the ratio of the retained strength after thermal shocking to the initial strength of the unshocked material. The effect of the thermal shock temperature dif- ference and the number of thermal shock cycles on the nor- malized retained strength are shown in Figs. 5 and 6 Damage starts Non-Steady State 是 Strain Fig. 2. Thermal shock effect on the stress-strain behavior of SiC/SiNC Fig. 4. The effect of shocking temperature on composite properties
3. Results and discussion 3.1. Thermal shock behavior The degradation of strength due to thermal shock was determined by measuring the retained strength after thermally quencing the specimens from different elevated temperatures to room temperature in water. These elevated temperatures are 400 C, 600 C and 800 C. Experiments were also performed on unshocked specimens at room temperature (RT). The stress–strain behaviors of both unshocked specimens, and specimens shocked from various elevated temperatures are shown in Fig. 2. From Fig. 2 it is clear that the mechanical properties of the thermally shocked samples are lower than those of the unshocked samples. Properties such as ultimate strength, yield strength, and elastic modulus all degraded due to thermal shock. It is also evident from Fig. 2 that the tensile stress–strain behavior of the composites under all testing conditions consists of two fundamental regions: the initial linear region and the final nonlinear region. In the linear region, it is assumed that the applied load is carried by both fibers and matrix. In the nonlinear region, which sustains more strain than the linear region, the load is gradually transferred from the matrix to the fibers. The nonlinear region also indicates a larger damage tolerance as a result of fibers bridging the cracks. The transition point from the linear to the nonlinear region signifies the initiation of significant matrix cracks. After the matrix cracks, fibers act to bridge the matrix cracks and enhance the toughness of the material. These cracks, however, permit the harsh environments to move easily into the composite, degrading the fiber/matrix interface as well as the fiber strength. The ultimate retained strength of each specimen after thermal shock was measured in order to determine the critical temperature difference (DTc). The effect of thermal shock temperature difference (DT) on the retained strength of this composite is shown in Fig. 3. The shocking temperature difference (DT), in this case, refers to the difference in temperature between the furnace and the room temperature (22 C). A common thermal shock parameter is the maximum difference in temperature (DT) that a ceramic material can sustain without cracking. This maximum difference in temperature (DT) below which no significant damage occurs is called the critical temperature difference (DTc). The critical temperature of a material, therefore, is a design parameter that signifies the limitation of working temperature for that material. Fig. 3 shows that the first significant drop of material strength occurs at about 350 C. Thus, the critical thermal shock temperature difference of this material can be tentatively assumed to be 350 C. It is also noticeable that there is a gradual decrease in strength beyond this critical temperature difference (DTc). Much literatures is available that deals with effect of thermal shock on the mechanical properties of materials. A typical property degradation curve due to thermal shock on CMC [10] is shown in Fig. 4. Fig. 4 shows that the onset of damage in CMC occurs at a critical temperature difference DTc. The damage progresses as DT increases and then eventually saturates at even some higher DT. It is understood that the beginning of the gradual decrease in mechanical properties was brought about by matrix cracking or debonding or both at DTc. The nonsteady state represents the continuation and enlargement state for matrix cracking or debonding or both. When the nonsteady state ends, the strength at the second steady state indicates that the reinforcing fibers bridge the cracks, which limits the thermal shock damage. From there on the strength of the composite is determined largely by the load carrying capability of the fibers and is usually not affected by the thermal shock damage. The thermal shock degradation behavior is best characterized by the normalized retained strength of the material, which is defined as the ratio of the retained strength after thermal shocking to the initial strength of the unshocked material. The effect of the thermal shock temperature difference and the number of thermal shock cycles on the normalized retained strength are shown in Figs. 5 and 6. 0 50 100 150 200 250 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 %Strain Stress (MPa) RT 400 ˚C 600 ˚C 800 ˚C Fig. 2. Thermal shock effect on the stress–strain behavior of SiC/SiNC composite. 180 185 190 195 200 205 210 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Retained Strength (MPa) ΔT (oC) Fig. 3. The effect of shock temperature difference on strength of the SiC/ SiNC composite. Mechanical Properties Damage starts Steady state Non-Steady State ΔTc ΔT Fig. 4. The effect of shocking temperature on composite properties. S. Salekeen et al. / Composite Structures 78 (2007) 477–485 479
S. Salekeen et al / Composite Structures 78(2007)477-485 --3 cycle 兰39>2352 8001000 △TCC 02004006008001000 Fig. 5. The effect of shock temperature difference on strength of SiC/SiNC Fig. 7. The effect of shock temperature difference on the modulus of Sic/ SINC composite. 105 Fig. 6. The effect of thermal shock cycles on the strength of SiC/SiNC No of thermal shock cycles Fig 8. The effect of thermal shock cycles on the modulus of SiC/SiNc Fig 5 indicates that for a particular thermal shock cycle there is a gradual decrease in retained strength with increasing shocking temperature difference. It is clear that it is also clear from both that the coupling effect of for a particular number of thermal shock cycles, the higher temperatures with number of thermal shock strength degradation rate is almost uniform for all temper- cycles on the retained mo is even greater than either ature differences. In Fig. 6. the same trend is observed with individual effect. increases in the number of thermal shock cycles as the tem- Some of the significant factors mentioned by some erature remains constant. It is clear that for a particular researchers that might affect the thermal shock behavior hermal shock temperature, a sharp decrease of strength of continuous fiber reinforced CMCs are: a mismatch of is observed for the first thermal cycle, after which the coefficients of thermal expansion between fiber and matrix strength degradation rate decreases and remains constant materials, the interfacial properties, the hold time in the as the number of thermal shock cycles increases. Further- furnace prior to thermal shock, the composites processing, more, both figures indicate that the combined effect of and the fiber architecture [14-22]. higher temperature with higher number of thermal shock cycles on the strength degradation is even greater than 3. 2. Acoustic emission behavior either individual effect. The marked decline in composite retained strength caused by quenching(shocking) as shown Recently, the acoustic emission(AE)technique has Figs. 5 and 6 can be attributed to further damage to the gained prominence for detecting the onset and propagation fibers in addition to the matrix cracks of microcracking in composite materials [23, 24]. Under The changes in retained modulus of this CMC as a func- load application, several fracture phenomena can occur tion of both the thermal shock temperature difference, and in composite materials, such as matrix microcracking the number of thermal shock cycles are shown in Figs. 7 fiber-matrix debonding, delamination and fibers failure and 8, respectively. From these figures similar trends to Corresponding to each of these physical phenomena those previously observed for the retained strength are also energy is released in various forms. One of these forms is bserved in the retained modulus. There is a gradual acoustic waves [23]. Thus, by monitoring the acoustic emis- decrease in the retained modulus when either the shocking sions, the actual onset of microcracking and other fracture temperature or the number of thermal shock cycles phenomena can be identified. This happens when a sharp increases. The rate of decrease is almost uniform as the increase in the cumulative number of ae events is temperature increases. In Fig. 8 the rate of decrease is observed. In this investigation, damage development in greater for the first thermal shock cycle, thereafter it composites during tensile testing is monitored by observing remains reasonably constant as the number of additional such AE events as AE energy and AE event counts. The thermal shock cycles increases. As in the retained strength, event count indicates the number of AE events above a
Fig. 5 indicates that for a particular thermal shock cycle there is a gradual decrease in retained strength with increasing shocking temperature difference. It is clear that for a particular number of thermal shock cycles, the strength degradation rate is almost uniform for all temperature differences. In Fig. 6, the same trend is observed with increases in the number of thermal shock cycles as the temperature remains constant. It is clear that for a particular thermal shock temperature, a sharp decrease of strength is observed for the first thermal cycle, after which the strength degradation rate decreases and remains constant as the number of thermal shock cycles increases. Furthermore, both figures indicate that the combined effect of higher temperature with higher number of thermal shock cycles on the strength degradation is even greater than either individual effect. The marked decline in composite retained strength caused by quenching (shocking) as shown in Figs. 5 and 6 can be attributed to further damage to the fibers in addition to the matrix cracks. The changes in retained modulus of this CMC as a function of both the thermal shock temperature difference, and the number of thermal shock cycles are shown in Figs. 7 and 8, respectively. From these figures similar trends to those previously observed for the retained strength are also observed in the retained modulus. There is a gradual decrease in the retained modulus when either the shocking temperature or the number of thermal shock cycles increases. The rate of decrease is almost uniform as the temperature increases. In Fig. 8 the rate of decrease is greater for the first thermal shock cycle, thereafter it remains reasonably constant as the number of additional thermal shock cycles increases. As in the retained strength, it is also clear from both figures that the coupling effect of higher temperatures with higher number of thermal shock cycles on the retained modulus is even greater than either individual effect. Some of the significant factors mentioned by some researchers that might affect the thermal shock behavior of continuous fiber reinforced CMCs are: a mismatch of coefficients of thermal expansion between fiber and matrix materials, the interfacial properties, the hold time in the furnace prior to thermal shock, the composites processing, and the fiber architecture [14–22]. 3.2. Acoustic emission behavior Recently, the acoustic emission (AE) technique has gained prominence for detecting the onset and propagation of microcracking in composite materials [23,24]. Under load application, several fracture phenomena can occur in composite materials, such as matrix microcracking, fiber–matrix debonding, delamination and fibers failure. Corresponding to each of these physical phenomena, energy is released in various forms. One of these forms is acoustic waves [23]. Thus, by monitoring the acoustic emissions, the actual onset of microcracking and other fracture phenomena can be identified. This happens when a sharp increase in the cumulative number of AE events is observed. In this investigation, damage development in composites during tensile testing is monitored by observing such AE events as AE energy and AE event counts. The event count indicates the number of AE events above a 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Retained Modulus (%) 1 cycle 3 cycles 5 cycles ΔT (o C) Fig. 7. The effect of shock temperature difference on the modulus of SiC/ SiNC composite. 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 0 12 3 45 6 No. of thermal shock cycles Retained Modulus (%) 400 ˚C 600 ˚C 800 ˚C Fig. 8. The effect of thermal shock cycles on the modulus of SiC/SiNC composite. 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Retained Strength (%) 1 cycle 3 cycle 5 cycle ΔT (o C) Fig. 5. The effect of shock temperature difference on strength of SiC/SiNC composite. 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 01 234 56 No. of thermal shock cycles Retained Strength (%) 400 ˚C 600 ˚C 800 ˚C Fig. 6. The effect of thermal shock cycles on the strength of SiC/SiNC composite. 480 S. Salekeen et al. / Composite Structures 78 (2007) 477–485
S. Salekeen et aL. Composite Structures 78(2007)477-485 threshold value in terms of amplitude. The threshold value has to be specified during data acquisition, which, in this case, is 40 dB. For AE analysis purposes, the load versus 10000 time curve is compared with the energy vs. time curve and the count vs time curve. For a particular time, changes in the behavior of the load curve can be correlated with corresponding changes in energy and event count curves 2000. As the crosshead rate and the displacement of the specimen during tensile testing are known, the time required to reach a certain displacement can be calculated, and then the load Time(sec) data can be correlated with the energy and count signals ▲600C x800C Fig 9 represents the load vS time curve whereas Figs. 10 and 1l show the aE energy vs. time and the ae counts Fig. Il. AE counts vs time graph at various temperatures time graphs respectively Figs. 10 and ll show that there are marked differences in acoustic emission responses between unshocked(RT)and This is understood that at the beginning of the fracture shocked specimens at critical points such as yield point process, numerous matrix microcracks initiate and then and specimen failure. It is also observed during testing that propagate as the applied load increases. This initiation shocked samples emit fer acoustic emissions at the early and propagation of matrix cracks yield weak AE signals ages of loading, but as failure approaches the emission which are visible before any kind of spike in the signal rate increases rapidly. So overall, the shock samples pro- observed. The presence of these microcracks did not result duce more Ae events to failure than the unshocked sam- in any kind of departure of material behavior from its lin- ples. It is assumed that the increase of AE events for earity as observed in the load-time curve, a phenomenon shocked samples as failure approaches indicates the possi- also exhibited by other fiber reinforced composites [24] bility of the onset of a micro-failure process as a result of This can be attributed to the fact that these microcracks further propagation of preexisting cracks formed or do not significantly affect the load carrying capacity of extended by the thermal shock treatment. The preexisting the composite Fig 9 shows that, at a time period of about crack can also come from pores and reaction damage sites 25-31 s, the load-time curves deviate from linearity. Close on fibers. As the failure approaches, the formation of an observation at the same time period indicates an initial increased number of enlarged cracks results in a corre- spike in the energy and count curves. The physical phe- sponding increase in AE events. nomenon corresponding to this initial spike is attributed to the initiation of significant matrix cracking- essentially when small microcracks coalesce to form a larger matrix crack. Since the initial spike corresponds well to the pro- portional limit of the material, it is therefore feasible to 乙 correlate the observed ae events with the actual damage phenomena occurring in the material. As the load continue to increase, some portions of the specimens experience 800°C fiber-matrix debonding or fiber breaking. As a result a weak area is created and the load is transferred to the remaining unfractured material. This intact region becomes Time(sec) overloaded by the load transfer, and as a result an enlarged Fig. 9. Force-time graph at various temperatures. area of debonding and broken fibers occurs. The corre- sponding AE signals are therefore, very strong at this region, indicating a larger number of activities as final damage approaches. The largest spike of AE signals occurs at about 170 s which corresponds to final failure. The final failure is associated with extensive fiber breakage. Fig. 12 shock cycles. Fig. 13, on the other hand, shows the counts vs. number of thermal shock cycles for different thermal shock temperatures. Similarly Figs. 14 and 15 show the AE energy vs. temperature and AE energy vs Time(sec) er of thermal shock cycles rest ◆RT400°C▲600Cx800 Figs. 12-15 display evidence of a gradual increase in AE energy and aE count events with increase of either the Fig. 10. AE energy vs time graph shocking temperature difference or the number of thermal
threshold value in terms of amplitude. The threshold value has to be specified during data acquisition, which, in this case, is 40 dB. For AE analysis purposes, the load versus time curve is compared with the energy vs. time curve and the count vs. time curve. For a particular time, changes in the behavior of the load curve can be correlated with corresponding changes in energy and event count curves. As the crosshead rate and the displacement of the specimen during tensile testing are known, the time required to reach a certain displacement can be calculated, and then the load data can be correlated with the energy and count signals. Fig. 9 represents the load vs. time curve whereas Figs. 10 and 11 show the AE energy vs. time and the AE counts vs. time graphs respectively. Figs. 10 and 11 show that there are marked differences in acoustic emission responses between unshocked (RT) and shocked specimens at critical points such as yield point and specimen failure. It is also observed during testing that shocked samples emit fewer acoustic emissions at the early stages of loading, but as failure approaches the emission rate increases rapidly. So overall, the shock samples produce more AE events to failure than the unshocked samples. It is assumed that the increase of AE events for shocked samples as failure approaches indicates the possibility of the onset of a micro-failure process as a result of further propagation of preexisting cracks formed or extended by the thermal shock treatment. The preexisting crack can also come from pores and reaction damage sites on fibers. As the failure approaches, the formation of an increased number of enlarged cracks results in a corresponding increase in AE events. This is understood that at the beginning of the fracture process, numerous matrix microcracks initiate and then propagate as the applied load increases. This initiation and propagation of matrix cracks yield weak AE signals which are visible before any kind of spike in the signal is observed. The presence of these microcracks did not result in any kind of departure of material behavior from its linearity as observed in the load–time curve, a phenomenon also exhibited by other fiber reinforced composites [24]. This can be attributed to the fact that these microcracks do not significantly affect the load carrying capacity of the composite. Fig. 9 shows that, at a time period of about 25–31 s, the load–time curves deviate from linearity. Close observation at the same time period indicates an initial spike in the energy and count curves. The physical phenomenon corresponding to this initial spike is attributed to the initiation of significant matrix cracking—essentially when small microcracks coalesce to form a larger matrix crack. Since the initial spike corresponds well to the proportional limit of the material, it is therefore feasible to correlate the observed AE events with the actual damage phenomena occurring in the material. As the load continue to increase, some portions of the specimens experience fiber–matrix debonding or fiber breaking. As a result a weak area is created and the load is transferred to the remaining unfractured material. This intact region becomes overloaded by the load transfer, and as a result an enlarged area of debonding and broken fibers occurs. The corresponding AE signals are therefore, very strong at this region, indicating a larger number of activities as final damage approaches. The largest spike of AE signals occurs at about 170 s which corresponds to final failure. The final failure is associated with extensive fiber breakage. Fig. 12 shows AE counts vs. temperature for different thermal shock cycles. Fig. 13, on the other hand, shows the AE counts vs. number of thermal shock cycles for different thermal shock temperatures. Similarly Figs. 14 and 15 show the AE energy vs. temperature and AE energy vs. number of thermal shock cycles respectively. Figs. 12–15 display evidence of a gradual increase in AE energy and AE count events with increase of either the shocking temperature difference or the number of thermal 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 0 50 100 150 200 Time (sec) Force (kN) RT 400 ˚C 600 ˚C 800 ˚C Fig. 9. Force–time graph at various temperatures. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 50 100 150 200 Time (sec) AE Energy (V) RT 400 ˚C 600 ˚C 800 ˚C Fig. 10. AE energy vs. time graph at various temperatures. 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 0 50 100 150 200 Time (sec) AE Count RT 400˚C ˚C ˚C 600 800 Fig. 11. AE counts vs. time graph at various temperatures. S. Salekeen et al. / Composite Structures 78 (2007) 477–485 481