Now assume that the problem is to maxImize n that case, individuals maximize (1-丌)U(Y-pl,0)+丌U(Y-pl,L Where l indicates some sort of loss In this case, the first order condition is 1-Tpui(r -pl,0)=pui(r-pl,l
Now assume that the problem is to maximize: In that case, individuals maximize: 1 UY pI, 0 UY pI,L Where L indicates some sort of loss: In this case, the first order condition is: 1 pU1Y pI, 0 pU1Y pI,L
In the case that c=0, this implies that U1(r-pl,0)=U1(r-pl,D) What does this imply about the value of /? What does this tell you about betting on sports events? How about insuring the death of child parent, etc
In the case that c 0, this implies that: U1Y pI, 0 U1Y pI,L What does this imply about the value of I? What does this tell you about betting on sports events? How about insuring the death of child, parent, etc.?
Moral Hazard- Self Protection Assume in this case that T can be changed with effort, i.e. there exists a function (d Which represents lowering the probability at a cost d Now the consumer maximizes w.r. t both l and d 1-i(dv(r -pl-d)+r(du(r-Z+I-pi This yields F.o.C (1-m)DU(Y-p-)=m(1-p)U/(Y-Z+1
Moral Hazard– Self Protection Assume in this case that can be changed with effort, i.e. there exists a function d which represents lowering the probability at a cost d. Now the consumer maximizes w.r.t. both I and d: 1 dUY pI d dUY Z I pI This yields F.O.C. 1 pU Y pI d 1 pU Y Z I